That statement is true
A-type conflict in a group decision appear if one member of the group want to appear more dominant toward the other.
A nominal group technique, will eliminate this type of situation and make all the members of the group feel equally valued which will eventually improve the group decision making process.
Answer:
trrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrsssssssssssssssssh
Explanation:
The most effective way would be for Alex to influence the outcome in her district with the election just a week away to call registered voters using an automated system that plays a message advising them to make the funding permanent.
Option: B
Explanation:
Referendum is a important step of changing constitution. Many of the states like Florida follow this way like Ireland. Registered voters would decide whether they permanently enshrine funding for wildlife protection in the Everglades or not.
For this purpose the most fruitful way is to call the registered voters by an auto generated message by advising them who are above 18 years old and permanent citizen of Florida to make the funding permanent.In this the the outcome in individual field will be more successful.
Answer: The correct answer is: Focus on her next level of needs.
Explanation: According to Maslow's theory of the hierarchy of needs, human beings have their needs organized in a pyramid.
The needs that are at the bottom of the pyramid must be satisfied for the individual to start satisfying the needs that are higher up. The need for security is lower in the hierarchy than the social needs.
In this particular case<u>, Erin already satisfied her needs of security because she already secured a good-paying job, a decent apartment, and an economical car, she also feels safe in her home, therefore, she now can move on to attend the needs that follow up in the hierarchy, which are social needs.</u>
<u />
Answer:
Naturalistic observation, interviews, and case studies
Explanation:
Three of the most common research methods are naturalistic observation, interviews, and case studies. Each one of them brings something different to the table:
- Naturalistic observation refers to studying subjects directly on their environment without any intervention from the researcher. This is a great method because watching people behave in a natural way will be very revealing and more truthful. When subjects know they are being observed, they often change their behaviour. Naturalistic observation thus requires the observer to be as anonymous and invisible as possible.
- An interview is a research method where the subject is asked to answer to some specific questions crafted by the researcher. Interviews allow the researchers have a much closer look at the subject, trying to ascertain the motives behind their behaviour. However, a problem with interviews is that the subjects often time won't respond truthfully, but will adjust their answers to what is expected from them.
- A case study is a method that goes more in depth than the other two, and the researcher tries to learn as much as possible about the subject through a variety of other methods, like observations, interviews, surveys, etc. Case studies are much thorough and deeper investigations, but they can be very time consuming, and require a subject that is willing to facilitate the work of the researcher, which isn't always possible.
