Answer:
because otherwise he could end up awaiting trial in prison for months.
Explanation:
"Independent spirit and relative freedom" women enjoyed in Etruscan society, works of art that support this argument was as follows-
- Etruscan women seem to have saved their personal character identities. This will become a critical issue if we consider that
- Etruscan women had been able to enjoy ownership of their own possessions, control economic activities, and go away wills ‒ all matters the ancient Greeks would have clearly considered preposterous.
- Etruscan women in art as a means via which those individuals carried out a certain sense of immortality with their identities via time, however this could also be visible as a manner for the Etruscans themselves,
- As a cultural entity distinct from the Romans or Greeks, regaining their identity and place in history that was lost by the Roman conquest.
- Etruscan women, unlike Greek or Roman women, participated in banquets. there are numerous examples of work of art, reliefs, and engravings depicting women reclining along guys at banquets.
Learn more about Etruscan women https://brainly.in/question/16645775
#SPJ9
Answer: B. he freed venezuelans from spanish rule
Explanation: I think lol
Answer:
A. Disillusionment with the Vietnam War
Explanation:
This is because this is the first war that was televisised to the American public. The war is a lot diffferent from other wars America got involved such as the reason why they were there to fight and the enemy America is fighting. The brutality of the war and war crimes such as the My Lai Massacre is what caused anger among the American public. Brainliest pIz?
Q2. I believe Loewen has a negative veiw of Columbus. I believe this because he seemed to identify all of Columbus's mistakes, and crimes against the indigenous people of that time. While reading the passage, I too felt a small spark of anger with the crimes committed.
Q3. I believe the outlook on Columbus is changing because we are acquiring more time to study his actions against the people, not only his "bringing of a new land".