Answer:
answer the cost will be higher
Answer:
The volume of the composite figure is approximately 3567.198 cubic feet.
Step-by-step explanation:
The composite figure consists in the combination of a right cone and a cuboid. The volume of the composite (
), in cubic feet, figure can be determined by this expression:
(1)
Where:
- Radius of the circle of the right cone, in feet.
- Height of the cone, in feet.
- Width of the cuboid, in feet.
- Height of the cuboid, in feet.
- Length of the cuboid, in feet.
If we know that
,
,
,
and
, then the volume of the composite figure is:



The volume of the composite figure is approximately 3567.198 cubic feet.
Answer:
2(3-x)
Step-by-step explanation:
IDK. I looked up the answer but i couldn't find it. I'm on UsaTestPrep and they gave me the same question.
A) Profit is the difference between revenue an cost. The profit per widget is
m(x) = p(x) - c(x)
m(x) = 60x -3x^2 -(1800 - 183x)
m(x) = -3x^2 +243x -1800
Then the profit function for the company will be the excess of this per-widget profit multiplied by the number of widgets over the fixed costs.
P(x) = x×m(x) -50,000
P(x) = -3x^3 +243x^2 -1800x -50000
b) The marginal profit function is the derivative of the profit function.
P'(x) = -9x^2 +486x -1800
c) P'(40) = -9(40 -4)(40 -50) = 3240
Yes, more widgets should be built. The positive marginal profit indicates that building another widget will increase profit.
d) P'(50) = -9(50 -4)(50 -50) = 0
No, more widgets should not be built. The zero marginal profit indicates there is no profit to be made by building more widgets.
_____
On the face of it, this problem seems fairly straightforward, and the above "step-by-step" seems to give fairly reasonable answers. However, if you look at the function p(x), you find the "best price per widget" is negatve for more than 20 widgets. Similarly, the "cost per widget" is negative for more than 9.8 widgets. Thus, the only reason there is any profit at all for any number of widgets is that the negative costs are more negative than the negative revenue. This does not begin to model any real application of these ideas. It is yet another instance of failed math curriculum material.