if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What is wrong with the graph?</h3>
When we graph over intervals like (a, b) or [a, b] or something like that, we use dots to define the end of the intervals, and to denote that the function ends abruptly or we have a jump.
In this case, you can see that between the end and the second part and the beginning of the third part there is a jump, so the use of dots is correct there, but if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
That is the only error with the graph.
If you want to learn more about piecewise functions:
brainly.com/question/3628123
#SPJ1
Answer: The correct option is (A) (2, -2).
Step-by-step explanation: Given that rectangle with vertices at K, L, M and N is graphed on the coordinate plane as shown in the figure.The figure is rotated 360° counterclockwise using the origin as the center of rotation.
We are to find the location of the image of point K after the rotation.
We know that
a rotation of 360° in counterclockwise direction about the origin map a point to itself. That is, the co-ordinates of the image point will be same as the original one.
From the figure, we see that the co-ordinates of point K are (2, -2).
Therefore, after rotation of 360° counterclockwise using the origin as the center of rotation,
the co-ordinates of the image of point K will also be (2, -2).
Thus, the location of the image of point K is (2, -2).
Option (A) is CORRECT.
The top answer on your screen is the answer. Hope this help
