<span>1 candy cost 1
2 candies cost 1+.50=1.50 ( here D is not an integer, hence we cannot buy 2 candies . so we can reject all cases where D is non Integer)
3 candies cost 1.50 +1 =2.50
4 candies cost 2.50+.50= 3
5 candies cost 3+1= 4
6 candies cost 4+.50= 4.50
7 candies cost 4.50+1=5.50
8 candies cost 5.50.+.50= 6
9 candies cost 6+1= 7
.....
13 candies cost =10
(i) D is prime
D=3 and N=4 (N is even)
D=7 N=9 (N is odd )
not sufficient
(ii) D is not Divisible by 3
D=1 N=1
D=4 N =5
D=7 N=9
D=10 N=13
so we see if D is not divisible 3 then N is always odd.</span>
I think tools, design, and materials
Answer:
Explanation:
The law of diminishing marginal utility helps to explain the negative slope of the demand curve and the law of demand.If the satisfaction obtained from a good declines, then buyers are willing to pay a lower price, hence demand price is inversely related to quantity demanded, which is the law of demand.
Answer:
c. less interested in paying a premium for fair trade
Explanation:
Indeed, in this case, according to Debra, who serves as the vice president of Theo Chocolate, one of the results of offering simpler products is that people find it less interesting to pay a premium for fair trade.
Answer:
B. an economic profit of $6.50
Explanation:
Note: The full question is attached
Price Q TR MR Output TC MC
2.75 3 8.25 - 3 4 -
2.50 4 10 1.75 4 4.5 0.5
2.25 5 11.25 1.25 5 4.75 0.25
2 6 12 0.75 6 5.75 1
1.75 7 12.25 0.25 7 7.75 2
For profit Max MR = MC. MC>MR
At Q = 5, MR = 1.25 & MC = 0.25
Economic profit = TR - TC = 11.25 - 4.75 = $6.5
But at Q = 6, MR = 0.75 MC = 1. Net benefit is negative
