What was the main point to the tenure of office act of 1867

2 answers:

7 0

The main point was to restrict the power of the President of the United States to remove certain office-holders without the approval of the Senate

slamgirl [31]3 years ago

3 0

The Tenure of Office Act of 1867 was an American federal law that regulated the dismissal of ministers from the Cabinet. It gained notoriety in particular through the impeachment proceedings against the President Andrew Johnson, who was accused of having violated it. In 1887, Congress rescinded the law. Later, in 1926, the Supreme Court invalidated a law similar to the Tenure of Office Act but which did not apply to Cabinet posts.

You might be interested in

What was the importance of the Harlem Hellfighters regimental band?

kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

According to the federal election commission, what is one action that a national party committee must preform hold a national co

krek1111 [17]

Answer:

The Correct Answer is

To hold a national convention

Explanation:

The national party committee should encourage the political program and policies of its party and should be responsible and accountable for the coordination of revenue-raising and the complete electoral strategy. The members of the committee can not be high officials of the public administration or members of Congress or the Government.

6 0

3 years ago

Who was responsible for initially questioning the effectiveness of affirmative action?

Alenkinab [10]

Board of Education

There are definite advantages as well as disadvantages of affirmative action as a policy to redress socio-economic inequality. The positives of this policy lies in the fact that it endorses the spread of education and employment for certain minority categories like the women of the society. This affirmative action helps to bring the minority community forward in case of all kinds of rights they were deprived of. The negative side or the disadvantage of this policy lies in the fact that several qualified applicants are deprived because of this and hence it creates discrimination among people.

3 0

3 years ago

Question: How did a dynasty lose or gain the Mandate of Heaven?

LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

B> - If the ruling dynasty was fair, it would keep the Mandate of Heaven.

Explanation:

The Mandate of Heaven was a belief in the establishment of a ruler from the qualities of a person. Under this Mandate, there is no specific rule that determines who can or cannot become the ruler. Rather, a person's qualities, such as being fair, just, how well he can rule, or how 'good' he is in terms of his behavior and qualities.

The belief that such a ruler is determined from the internal qualities comes from the idea of the ruler being the "son of heaven". In other words, such type of person is good, just, kind, fair, and does not indulge in immoral or bad activities, which makes him ideal for a leader. Moreover, he will also be accepted by the gods, which is a huge factor.

So, if a ruling dynasty or a ruler is fair, he can keep the Mandate of Heaven but if not, then the Mandate cannot be his.

Thus, the correct answer is option B.

4 0

3 years ago

Arguably, the most important economic activity that occurs in the Middle East region is

Advocard [28]

Arguably, the most important economic activity that occurs in the Middle East region is "oil production," since this is where a large majority of the economic profits come from.

6 0

3 years ago