Answer:
option c
Explanation:
According to Machiavelli, the ends always justify the means—no matter how cruel, calculating or immoral those means might be. Tony Soprano and Shakespeare’s Macbeth may be well-known Machiavellian characters, but the man whose name inspired the term, Niccolo Machiavelli, didn’t operate by his own cynical rule book. Rather, when Machiavelli wrote The Prince, his shrewd guidelines to power in the 16th century, he was an exiled statesman angling for a post in the Florentine government. It was his hope that a strong sovereign, as outlined in his writing, could return Florence to its former glory.
Machiavelli’s guide to power was revolutionary in that it described how powerful people succeeded—as he saw it—rather than as one imagined a leader should operate.
Before his exile, Machiavelli had navigated the volatile political environment of 16th-century Italy as a statesman. There were constant power struggles at the time between the city-states of Italy, the Holy Roman Empire, France and Spain
hope it helps you
please mark me as brainlist
The Declaration of Independence
Answer:
Your question is very ambiguous. Assuming that your question is about colonization, I would try my best to answer. Colonization (taking of land) was justified into three categories: God, gold, and glory.
Explanation:
<h2>Europeans justified their colonialism that what their doing is "holy work" because they are widening their religious belief (Christianity) to save indigenous people. They used religion to justified their brutal ways of taking the land away from the "indians" and they believed that by their influence, they were giving them a "better" life. Europeans also justifies their colonization by expanding their kingdom and making them more powerful (glory). Lastly, colonization happened because people seek more riches (gold) and spices. </h2>
