1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horsena [70]
3 years ago
9

What justifications/reasons were used to take the land ?

History
1 answer:
bulgar [2K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Your question is very ambiguous. Assuming that your question is about colonization, I would try my best to answer. Colonization (taking of land) was justified into three categories: God, gold, and glory.

Explanation:

<h2>Europeans justified their colonialism that what their doing is "holy work" because they are widening their religious belief (Christianity) to save indigenous people. They used religion to justified their brutal ways of taking the land away from the "indians" and they believed that by their influence, they were giving them a "better" life. Europeans also justifies their colonization by expanding their kingdom and making them more powerful (glory). Lastly, colonization happened because people seek more riches (gold) and spices. </h2>

You might be interested in
A junta is defined as
Veronika [31]
<span>A small group that controls the government.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the name of the radio talks Roosevelt would give to the public called
jasenka [17]

<em>FIRESIDE CHATS is the answer</em>

7 0
4 years ago
How did the league of nations respond to aggression by japan italy and germany?
hram777 [196]
They didn't. They didn't have the firepower to battle against them because they lacked the support of the United States and they wouldn't fight wars if they weren't important for them. They tried to appease with them but eventually it proved to be a massive failure as the Axis forces eventually attacked and occupied them as well.
8 0
4 years ago
“The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be ,secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from the
Pavlova-9 [17]
That is a quote said by Patrick Henry at the Virginia Convention. 
4 0
3 years ago
Which statement about the effects of the Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is TRUE?
Alex
The answer is c. :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Germany takes alsace-lorraine region from france in the franco-prussian war.
    13·1 answer
  • The role of religion in politics has changed in recent American history. How? Why?
    10·1 answer
  • Question 4 of 10
    9·2 answers
  • What effects do you think gold mining had on the California environment
    6·2 answers
  • Help it’s a quiz I will give you brainliest points
    7·1 answer
  • What is the role of the Cabinet?
    9·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST AND 50 POINTS PLZ HELP ASAP!
    6·1 answer
  • What system divided Indian
    6·1 answer
  • Who is Joji?<br> Answer in Own Words
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution is accurate?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!