If the production of a good created both external costs and external benefits, but the external costs were greater, without government intervention, a market economy will not produce the product at all.
In the production and consumption of goods and services, there exist costs that are passed on to a third party. The general public, who is ultimately responsible for paying for them, is in fact subsidizing goods and services with external costs.
External costs are still necessary to be paid for even when they are not included in the product's price. It is ultimately the responsibility of society as a whole to pay for external costs through taxes, accident compensation, medical expenditures, insurance premiums, deterioration in environmental quality, and losses in natural capital.
Usually, the price of goods and services includes External costs, which results in a higher overall cost. Because consumers frequently select the lowest options, clean, sustainable products have a pricing disadvantage.
Learn more about External costs here
brainly.com/question/13524644
#SPJ4
Answer:
A per se violation
Explanation:
A per se violation is one that violates antitrust laws for example agreements made that violates the Sherman antitrust act. It has adverse effects on the competitiveness of a market.
Sherman antitrust act of 1980 is aimed at regulating competitiveness in a market. It prohibits anticompetitive agreements, and unilateral activities that tries to monopolize a market.
In this scenario Omega corporation and precision products, inc., are the principal suppliers of their product in their market. They make an agreement that one will focus on retailers and the other on wholesalers.
This is an attempt to monopolize the market by the two principal suppliers, and is a violation of the Sherman antitrust act.
Answer:
C. Sleeping in late and waking up early.
Explanation:
Two or more events are said to be mutually exclusive if and only if they can't happen at the same time.
Going with the above brief analysis, we.can easily say which of the pair of events is not mutually exclusive.
1. Rolling a 4 on a six-sided die and on a four-sided die
It's 100% possible to have an outcome of 4 when a 4 sided die and when a 6 sided die are rolled, whether at the same time or on different occasions. So, this pair of events are not mutually exclusive
2. Making rice and making corn
This pair of events are not mutually exclusive because it's possible to make rice and corn at the same time either together as a meal or separately using different cooking utensils
3. Sleeping in late and waking up early
This pair of events are mutually exclusive. This is so because literally, it's not possible to sleep late and wake up early at the same time.
You sleep early to wake early and you sleep late to wake late.
4. Going to work and riding the bus.
This pair of events are not mutually exclusive because they can occur at the same time when you go to work a bus.
So, option C is the correct answer
Answer: debit to Stock Investments for $55,080.
Explanation:
As this is an investment in another company, it will count as an asset which means that when it increases, the account will have to be debited. It will therefore be debited for $55,080 to show the investment.
Cash will decrease by the same amount which means that it will have to be credited because assets are credited when they decrease.
Dr Stock Investments $55,080
Cr Cash $55,080
