Answer:
Frictional unemployment cannot by itself explain the fact that the late 2010s saw more job openings than unemployed workers.
Instead, frictional unemployment points to the fact that some people are unemployed because they are just entering the labor market for the first time after a long period of absence.
Explanation:
As a part of natural unemployment, frictional unemployment arises when workers search for new jobs or transition from one job to another. During economic recession, there is no increase in frictional unemployment. Typical examples of frictional unemployment are caused by graduating students who join the labor force and are unemployed until they find work and parents who rejoin the workforce after taking sometime to stay at home and raise their children.
When a firm sees average costs start to increase as production increases, this is known as diseconomies of scale.
What Are Diseconomies of Scale?
When a corporation or business expands to the point where the costs per unit rise, this is known as a diseconomy of scale. It happens when a firm's use of economies of scale is no longer viable. According to this theory, when output increases, a firm experiences an increase in costs rather than continuing to see reducing expenses and rising output.
What causes diseconomies scale?
Diseconomies of scale can be the result of several things, including poor management and employee communication, a lack of drive, a lack of coordination, and a loss of concentration.
How do you manage diseconomies of scale?
Businesses may divide themselves into more controllable parts in an effort to alleviate scale-related inequities. A huge multinational, for instance, might be divided up into regional geographic areas, with local managers being rewarded for maximizing efficiency.
Learn more about diseconomies of scale: brainly.com/question/27960803
#SPJ4
Answer:
The annual worth of the overhead costs for 7 year-period is
A = $389743.42.
<em>Then the time value of the annual worth is discounted by 8%</em>
∴ $389743.42 x 0.08 = $31179.47.
Explanation:
Using the formula
A = P(1 + r/n)
Where:
A = ?
t = 7
P = $200,000.00
r = 10%
n= 1
TVM =8%
∴ A = $200,000.00(1 + 0.10/1)
A = $200,000.00(1.10)
A = $200,000.00(1.9487171)
A = $389743.42
<em>Then the time value of the annual worth is discounted by 8%</em>
∴ $389743.42 x 0.08 = $31179.47
Answer:
Question a:
The non-controlling interest of Rockne´s 2018 net income is $111,000.- calculated by taking 30% of Rockne´s net income of $370,000.-
Question B:
There are 3 entries required to eliminate te sale of goods form rochne to doone.
The first entry eliminates the sales recorded by rockne against te inventory or cost of goods sold by recorded by doone. To consider, the 60% of the purchases went trhough cost of good sol d and 40% of the purchases remain in inventory until the following year. Here is the engru:
Debit/sales/$530
Credit/COGS/ ($318) 60%
Credit inventory ($212) 40%
The next entry has to do with the amount of inventory that remained from the last intercompany transaction. This is caclulated usin 40% of 2017 sales, which were $430. So:
Debit inventory $172
Credit Cogs ($172)
The last part is to eliminate the recievable on the book of rockne when they made te sale
Debit Payable $530
Credit receivable ($530)
Answer:
I think the answer is C need .... opportunity