For his own sake, no. What he did blatantly put himself in danger and finally was placed under interrogation, etc & so forth.
For the sake of science, yes. What he did, and the consequences thereof, would have publicised his struggle, especially during the age of Enlightenment. Although what he did might also have momentarily pushed people away from science in fear of the consequences of facing the church due to the harsh punishment that he was subjected to. His persistence was, in the end only healthy for the development of science in later years.
Answer:
many African Americans were elected to office at all levels.
Explanation:
The Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965 by the Congress. The voting rights act ensured there was no discrimination in the voting process as a result of race , tribe and literacy levels.
When the Act was passed there was a high increase in the number of Africans Americans elected into various offices and posts in the country which was the turning point in the country in terms of inclusiveness of all races.
Answer: C : The property clause of the constitution, the due process clause of the fifth amendment, and the fact that African Americans were not citizens.
Answer:
They were concerned in giving the national government more power.
They felt that the states had too much power.
They felt that the Constitution did nothing to protect the peoples' rights
Explanation:
The main issues the Antifederalists had
with the US Constitution was that they felt the national government had too much power, the constitution did not protect the rights of people, and the states had too much power.
Anti-Federalists were against the 1787 United States Constitution because they did not feel the Constitution protected the rights of the people and the central government wielded much power.
Yes of course, The United States fought to own the right of freedom to vote. The country is founded on the belief of democracy. That we have a choice to who we want to lead us.
^ ps I bs that whole thing haha sound good tho
