Answer:
It should accepted.
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&Units&Cost&Total\\$Special Order&49&2,590&126,910\\$Variable Cost&49&1,440&-70,560\\$rejected local&&&0\\$additional cost&&&0\\$Net Income&&&56350\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26Units%26Cost%26Total%5C%5C%24Special%20Order%2649%262%2C590%26126%2C910%5C%5C%24Variable%20Cost%2649%261%2C440%26-70%2C560%5C%5C%24rejected%20local%26%26%260%5C%5C%24additional%20cost%26%26%260%5C%5C%24Net%20Income%26%26%2656350%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
We will compare the Special order with the variable cost associate with their productions.
As the orders has a postive income after variables expenses it should be accepted as contributes with the payment of fixed cost and this sales wasn't planned when solvign for the cost. Not doing the sale will avoid the comapny the opportunity of a profitable business cappable of allocate more fixed cost.
Answer:
The answer is: A) A decrease in the price of paper used to make greeting cards.
Explanation:
In normal market conditions, an increase in the equilibrium quantity of greeting cards means that the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied of greetings cards increased. Usually an increase in the quantity supplied will result in an increase of the price of the good or service. But on this specific case something else made the price of the cards decrease. The only one of the four possible options that can explain an external cause for a decrease in the price of greetings cards, is a decrease in the price of paper used to manufacture them.
False. Your primary motivation for investing is for tax savings. Your motivation for investing money shouldn't solely be a tax break, you should always have a plan. When you invest, you should be thinking of why, in the future, investing was a good idea. Not the current little but of tax break you can get if the money goes in tax free. Always have a plan and a reason for investing your money into something.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
TRUE, in the question, the government is going to auction off permits equal to one third of total emissions in the economy (so two-thirds of all emissions must be abated)
however, the firm will buy 100 permits even though thir marginal cost is below $ 15. because here the firm will get a monopoly in holding the permits of one third of total emissions in the economy. this is such a huge benefit for the firm and by acquiring this permits the firm can transfer the permission permits to other firm with high price or they can distribute the permits of emission among the different firms below the size of the emission permits holding firm. thus, even though marginal abatement cost of$8 has a special opportunity to buy 100 permits at a price of $15 per permits, the firm will resort to buy the permits. the power in handling the emission permits and the monopoly getting the firm in holding the permits allow the firm to act as a leader in the economy compared to other firm who don't have the emission permits. thus, the money gain and the authority gaining in emission permit hold the firm to buy the permits even though their marginal cost is below $15
