Answer:
D. the combinations of output and the interest rate where the goods market is in equilibrium.
Explanation:
The IS curve means investment-savings curve.
The IS curve is the combinations of output and the interest rate where the goods market is in equilibrium.
It is a curve which shows the different combinations of income (Y) and the real interest rate (r) such that the market for goods and services is in equilibrium.
This means that, every point on the IS curve is an income/real interest rate pair (Y,r) such that the demand for goods is equal to the supply of goods(Qs=Qd) or equivalently, the desired national saving is equal to desired investment.
Answer:
The Legume Division's net operating income last year was d. $45,000
Explanation:
Turnover (on operating assets) = Total Sales/ Operating assets
From the formula,
Operating assets = Total Sales/Turnover (on operating assets) = $900,000/3 = $300,000
Return on investment (ROI) is calculated by using following formula:
ROI = Net income/Total investment
Net Income = ROI x Total investment
At the Legumes Division of Gervani Corporation, Total investment = Operating assets = $300,000
Net Income = 15% x $300,000 = $45,000
Answer:
Checking Account, Savings Account, Safety Deposit Box
Explanation:
Banks are financial institutions that provide a wide variety of financial services to their customers. They accept customer deposits and issue loans. Commercial banks act as intermediaries between the supply side and demand side of credit.
Commercial banks are also known as deposit-taking institutions. Deposits facilities offered by banks include
- Checking accounts,
- Savings accounts,
- Safety Deposit Box
- Money Markets accounts
- Certificated of Deposits accounts
Hi there
1,000÷0.20
=5,000
5,000−1,000
=4,000....Answer (this is the total amount of money can be created)
Hope it helps
Answer:
The principle in Law 'Nemo dat quod non habet' states that an individual connot give what he does not have
Indeed Tom can rescind the contract with Matthew as he possesses voidable title to the balls
Explanation:
Until consideration has moved from Matthew to Tom the validity of the agreement/Contract remains inconclusive.
Considering his Account is not funded means he has no valid title to the Balls, he is merely in possession of the Balls but not the Owner.
Tom can sue demanding a return of the Balls irrespective of Matthew having sold them to Aaron.
Another illustration could be given of a thief who sells off a property. Inspite of the Buyer being unaware, because the thief has a voidable title it makes the transaction invalid.
