1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka57 [31]
4 years ago
13

Which of the following is an INCORRECT statement regarding covenants not to​ compete? A. In order to be​ enforceable, a covenant

not to compete must be reasonable regarding the line of business protected. B. If a covenant not to compete is​ unreasonable, the courts may​ either: 1) refuse to enforce​ it; or​ 2) change it so that it is​ reasonable; usually, courts choose the first option. C. In order to be​ enforceable, a covenant not to compete must be reasonable regarding the geographic area protected. D. In order to be​ enforceable, a covenant not to compete must be reasonable regarding the duration of the restriction. E. The reasonableness of covenants not to compete is examined on a uniform basis.
Social Studies
1 answer:
bearhunter [10]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The correct answer is E The reasonableness of covenants not to compete is examined on a uniform basis.

Explanation:

The reasonableness of covenants not to compete is examined on a uniform basis is an INCORRECT statement regarding covenants not to​ compete

You might be interested in
Which of the following has the greatest impact on global warming?
Anvisha [2.4K]

<span>Forest depletion has the greatest impact on global warming. The answer is letter C. the trees in the first provides shelter, food and oxygen in the surrounding. One of the causes of global warming is CO2 and CO2 is used by plants for cellular respiration. If these are destroyed, the things it gives will be gone and therefore will increase global warming.</span>

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Once one has rejected the dogmatic, authoritarian limitations of the Stage 1: Garden of Eden style of thinking, he or she usuall
Daniel [21]

Answer: FALSE

Explanation: The garden of Eden style of thinking is mythological style of thinking: people who believes that things not seen and has no prove of trace, has actually existed.

For someone to be skeptical means the person doesn't accept information easily, such person will always want to verify the information by asking more questions, so he can understand how the information is interrelated with the fact known.

This means that if a person rejects the mythological view of the garden of Eden, it is not certain that such person is highly skeptical, because such person may accept the mythological view of the existence of heaven and hell. Such person may only be skeptical about one thing and may not be skeptical about another thing, this means the person is not highly skeptical.

7 0
4 years ago
An extensive survey revealed that children with relatively high self-esteem tend to picture God as kind and loving, whereas thos
ANTONII [103]

Answer:

d) assuming that association proves causation              

Explanation:

By association proves causation, it means that there is a relationship between two different variables. Fundamentally, for the association to occur, there must be the causation that needs to be distinguished.

The term causation specifies that one event leads to the occurrence of the other event, hence there is a causal relationship between the two different events.

Here, in the question above, the survey revealed a causal relationship between self-esteem and a child's view towards God.

4 0
3 years ago
Your cousin has come to stay with you for a week It rains every day, spoliling many of your plans. You apologize over and over,
disa [49]

The correct answer is egocentrism

Preoperational thinking in children, a theory developed by the famous psychologist Jean Piaget, describes the characteristics of reasoning between 2 and 7 years of age.

Preoperational thinking is the stage of cognitive development that the child goes through between 2 and 7 years old. It was the psychologist Jean Piaget who developed the knowledge of the evolution of human thought from birth.

<u>This period is characterized by the following factors: </u>

The emergence of language, which conditions all mental schemes.

The possibility of speaking enables a different mental scheme, in which the symbolic function is paramount. The child uses symbols to represent objects, places and people. She understands that words are used to designate the things that are around.

It assumes your identity, despite the changes your body goes through. It recognizes itself, even as it grows and changes. The same thing happens with the mother, the father and the brothers. The child identifies them as such, even if their appearance changes.

Little by little, the child acquires the ability to put himself in the shoes of others. The stagings allow her to assume the role of other people she knows. The child will imagine the mother in the kitchen, for example.

Egocentrism is very much present throughout this phase. The child still deals with the world from itself. She thinks that everything was done and thought for her to use it. This makes abstract thinking very difficult.

5 0
4 years ago
Which of the following is false regarding legal cases discussed in the text? Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultram
nevsk [136]

Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.

Explanation:

All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.  

United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.  

However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.

While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Researchers have found that the reason nurses do not draw on research are related to
    6·1 answer
  • A scientist is using his knowledge of statistics to determine whether test results show that a composite drug has effectively co
    12·1 answer
  • The CSS ___ stopped Union Navy advances on the James River.
    12·2 answers
  • William h. white, in his best-selling book ________________________, criticized the idea that conformity was the best pathway to
    15·1 answer
  • Let's see if anyone in this community can answer this question on a GED pretest :-)
    8·1 answer
  • Why would an economist use real GDP rather than nominal GDP to measure growth?
    5·1 answer
  • Does anybody go to lakeville school
    9·2 answers
  • Please help me! It’s about Pakistan
    8·1 answer
  • According to existentialist philosophy, the opposite of living in bad faith is ________.
    9·1 answer
  • When a person has just had a large amount of a reinforcer, will the reinforcer be more or less effective at that time?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!