Answer:
The reporting difference is not an ethical breach of confidence between the consumer and the industry.
Explanation:
The information being presented is not confidential information. As a result, there is no ethical breach of confidence. Usually, such a lawsuit for breach of confidence is an action originating in common law concerning information between the airline and the consumers, when one of these parties decides to use the available confidential information for an unfair gain or advantage. This is not the case here between the airlines and the consumers of its services. Therefore, the case for breach of confidence should deal with the restriction of the dissemination of commercially viable information.
Answer:
Can SPI sue Med-Express in an Illinois court? Why or why not? Which statute (rule) applies here?
Yes, SPI can sue Med-Express in an Illinois court due to the minimum contacts doctrine. This is an actual court case that the North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled in favor of SPI. The minimum contacts rule states that in order for a business to be sued in another jurisdiction it must have maintained minimum contacts with residents of that state. Minimum contacts may include making business with individuals or companies that reside in the other state, visiting the other state or incorporating in the other state. In this case, Med-Express made business with SPI, and SPI is a resident of Illinois.
Answer:
e. team leader
Explanation:
Team members usually report to the first-line manager, that has the power to fire employees, manages personnel and is accountable for the team's performance. Nonetheless, any of the team members may be tasked with becoming a team leader, the boss charged with coordinating team activities in order to produce vital outcomes.Team leaders might not have control over the other team members, yet they are required to provide direction, encouragement and guidelines for others; organize group initiatives; and settle disputes.
Correct/Complet question:
A person who drove a manual-transmission car for years finds out that when driving a car with an automatic transmission, he often lifts his foot to step on the clutch. This driver is experiencing
A. parallel distributed processing
B. an articulatory loop
C. positive transfer
D. proactive interference
E. retroactive interference
Answer:
D, proactive interference.
Explanation:
Proactive interference is the interference of things that have previously been learnt with new learning situations.
Simply put, proactive interference is a situation in which things from the past that one has learnt creeps up occasionally or frequently in new and present situation.
In the case of the above question, the driver keeps raising his foot to step on the clutch which isn't in an automatic transmission vehicle. This is as a result of his past experience with manual transmission vehicle wherein he had to raise his foot from time to time to shift transmission gear.
Cheers.
Answer:
Remote shutoff capability. Require additional back-up systems to shut down offshore wells automatically. ...
Relief well capability. At minimum, adopt Canada's "same-season relief well capability" requirement. ...
Spill penalties. Impose meaningful financial penalties for deepwater spills. ...
Energy legislation. ...
Moratorium.
Explanation:
hope this helps