1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alecsey [184]
3 years ago
6

Ann lives in a state that has a 2 year statute of limitations and a 10 year statute of repose on negligence cases. Two bad thing

s happen to her in 2018. First, she is involved in a car accident that is entirely the fault of Donny Driver. Immediately after the wreck, she is operated on my Sally Surgeon. Sally does a careless job of reconstructing Ann's elbow, but it is done in a way that causes no initial pain and that Ann does not even notice until 2020. Now it is 2029. Ann is frustrated by her ongoing elbow pain, and decides that she wants to sue both Donny and Sally. Can her lawsuit proceed if the defendants raise the defenses described in this section?Group of answer choicesYes, against Donny and Sally.Yes, against Donny only.Yes, against Sally only.No.
Law
1 answer:
grandymaker [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Yes, against Sally only.

Explanation:

With the information given in the question, Ann´s lawsuit will not proceed after Donny´s defendant raise the defenses of limitations.

A statute of limitations looks to set a maximum time after which an event could be legally imported and a lawsuit against it will pass.

A statute of repose limits the time that an action could be brought back because of a particular event.

The bad things that happened to Ann were in 2018 so, for the car accident she had until 2020 to initiate a lawsuit.

On the other hand, the statute of repose began to run once the affected notice the problem that the particular event, in this case, the negligence from Sally, is caused. Ann noticed the pain on her elbow in 2020 so she had until 2030 to initiate a lawsuit.

I hope this answer helps you.

You might be interested in
Jack purchases a cola drink at a fast food chain, while drinking he determines the cola is a caustic drain cleaner. Jack may sue
Natali [406]

Answer:

breach of the implied of merchantability

Explanation:

Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.

5 0
3 years ago
FORUM DESCRIPTION
Mkey [24]

Answer:

dont

Explanation:

You dont want to do that for something very important

8 0
3 years ago
Which amendment places a 2 term limit on the President of the United<br> States *
scoray [572]
The twenty second amendment
8 0
3 years ago
Josh and Suzie are teen parents. They can choose to bear all the financial and legal burdens of having a child. What legal provi
NeTakaya
1st Blank: Extend
2nd Blank: Can
5 0
3 years ago
When Edwin Sutherland closely examined companies in the United States, what was he surprised to find?
sveta [45]

Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:

A. Most of the executives were secretly blue-collar workers.

B. Companies were careful never to violate American law.

C. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was unintentional.

D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.

Answer:

D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.

Explanation:

Edwin Sutherland was surprised to discover scenes of corruption and violation of laws within American industries. He was even more surprised when he discovered that these violations were done intensionally, promoting the benefit of entrepreneurs who had no commitment to order and honesty. These crimes are known as White Collar and are made by people who already live a wealthy life and without economic difficulties.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read this passage from the Articles of Confederation:
    5·1 answer
  • The US Supreme Court ruled the Erdman Act was unConstitutional because Select one: a. it interfered in due process of law b. all
    15·1 answer
  • Who served three years in reform school for attempted burglary
    11·2 answers
  • General principles of insurance law​
    7·1 answer
  • Abdel fields vs United States explained
    8·1 answer
  • Why do you want to become a FTO? * A FTO is a Field Training Officer <br> 3 sentences minimum
    15·1 answer
  • 5. Define the following terms.
    10·1 answer
  • Which is NOT been a reason for the increased need of forensic science evidence?
    8·1 answer
  • Question 3 (1 point)
    10·1 answer
  • When inflation is rising 200% it is
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!