Explanation:
The European nations were able to conquer large sections of Africa in those times because they had more advanced military technology. Europeans easily adapted to African climate and topography. But Also, Europe, has more advances in technology in warfare, transportations. Also their governments are strong and stable due to ones careful rule.
But the real reason for European dominant is because they really and I mean really focus on their militaristic aspect as which they relied on for stability, conquest, and glory because thousands of years, Kings and some Queens are tought the ways of war and how war can give more than just territory and as a matter of fact Kings had trained themselves in Europe for milania, so not just did Kings evolve but the technology to fight among themselves were drastically improved as well.
This is all the information I have sadly.
Answer:
They grew up differently and had a different mindset.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Anasazi built their dwellings under overhanging cliffs to protect them from the elements. Anasazi means "ancient outsiders." Like many peoples during the agricultural era, the Anasazi employed a wide variety of means to grow high-yield crops in areas of low rainfall.
Explanation:
<span>Vietnam showed that the us could not always just play kingmaker and intervene in a country to stop it from becoming strategically unfavorable in a global sense</span>
Answer:
I believe this is true, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
