Chief Justice John Marshall stated last 1803 in the case of Marbury v. Madison that "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each."
It implies that the judicial department applies the law and the understanding and interpretation therein would still be based on the designated person. If soever, the interpreter or representative in the judicial department would make any conflict with the intent, process, actual application of the law (the two representation of law), the courts would be the end to finalize the decision.
I believe the answer is C but i'm not for sure
it created a confederation with weak central power. the articles of confederation were meant to be temporary, and therefore were not very well thought out. it had lots of faults, but the main problem was how weak the entire thing was
Explanation:
They learn how an artist that just paints in one color of blue makes thousands of dollars on a blue painting.
Answer:
an invention. the assembly line. Henry Ford made it popular but some one else created it
