1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zlopas [31]
3 years ago
10

Today, individuals who post content on social media Web sites are not held legally responsible for any forms of criminal activit

y because social media allows people to "blow off some steam" and say whatever they want to. True False
Law
1 answer:
Lapatulllka [165]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<h3>True.</h3>

Explanation:

No doubt individuals who post content on social media cannot just 'blow off some steam' unless it is thoroughly researched or proven otherwise. In most cases, individuals who post contents online are held legally responsible if their contents or statements are misleading or defamatory.

However, they are not held legally responsible for any forms of criminal activity as publishing wrong contents or making defamatory statements usually fall under the purview of 'tort' or civil cases. The parties are also liable to be sued for libel or defamation in civil courts.

You might be interested in
With rising campaign costs, how can we ensure that a candidate will represent the majority of people
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

There are many answers so ima give one, We can listen and understand the candidates objective by looking at there past, Most would have done charity or giving to people in need. When they were younger they weren't as fortunate and lived like the majority before they became a candidate. This may show if they are trust worthy enough to represent the majority because they understand what its like for people in need.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Can someone please answer this
ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer:

B) by lending money at interest

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who pays private security firms for their contribution to public safety?
melomori [17]

Answer:

Private security officers are increasingly being asked to support law enforcement and emergency personnel, as well as assist with evacuations and other emergency procedures. Many government entities, such as the DHS headquarters itself, military bases and other facilities both here and abroad, rely on private security.

The private security industry is a crucial component of security and safety in the United States and abroad. Today, private security is responsible not only for protecting many of the nation‘s institutions and critical infrastructure systems, but also for protecting intellectual property and sensitive corporate information. U.S. companies also rely heavily on private security for a wide range of functions, including protecting employees and property, conducting investigations, performing pre-employment screening, providing information technology security, and many other functions.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Use your understanding of the policy process to put these steps in order.
adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

1. 2) Fishermen report low catch of species for eating.

Fishermen will first report that they were unable to catch much fish.

2. 3) Public hearings are held to determine all the possible solutions.

There will then be a public hearing where the possible reasons and solutions to the fish problem are discussed.

3. 4)Marine scientists count fish population.

As part of the solution, marine scientists will count the populations of fish in the water.

4. 5)The Department of Fish and Game evaluates the repopulation of fisheries.​

Based on this count, the Department of Fish and Game will research to find out how they can repopulate the water bodies.

5. Department of Fish and Game sets limits for fishermen.

As a result of this research, the Department will come up with a limit on the amount of fish that can be caught in a particular period to enable to fish population to rise to a certain level again.

4 0
3 years ago
Who must obey the law in the United States?
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

Its A. all citizens

Explanation:

everyone has to follow the law even if they are not making money

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In Furman v. Georgia (1972), the Supreme Court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had denied Furman the right
    8·2 answers
  • Buying or selling a vehicle in Florida must always include which of the following? using an automobile dealership trading in an
    9·1 answer
  • Match the microscopes with their uses.
    7·1 answer
  • Prior to the 1970s, how often did voters have to register to vote?
    6·1 answer
  • How can the committee chair influence legislation
    13·1 answer
  • Points :)<br><br><br> lolllllllllllll
    11·2 answers
  • Kick kati b out kick katti b out
    12·2 answers
  • Why are police officers often reluctant to get mental health counseling, and how are police departments attempting to make it ea
    15·1 answer
  • During a criminal trial, lawyers use their opening statements in order to:
    15·1 answer
  • What is your ideal society? explain.​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!