The legal advice that would be given here would depend on whether or not the person who accepted to purchase the shock absorber acted as an agent or broker.
<h3>Who is an agent or broker?</h3>
A broker is described as a person or organization that negotiates contracts and serves as a middleman between a buyer and a seller in exchange for a fee.
A broker is a non-party to a transaction and is distinct from an agent, who represents the primary party in a transaction.
It is important to note that the element that changes the equation is whether or not the "someone" carried out the above transaction for a fee to them.
If they did, the they may be liable to ensure that you got proper value for money. If not, then they are not liable, they were simply acting on your instruction.
Another line of recourse would be to check the warranties and guaranties given on the product that was purchased.
Learn more about agency:
brainly.com/question/23534924
#SPJ1
The statement that is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading is: The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit.
What is protocol?
Protocol can be defined as a set of guideline or policy that is expected of a person or an individual to follow or abide by.
Since parents or students have the right to ask that a school correct education records in which they tend to believe to be inaccurate or misleading. The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading.
Learn more about protocol here:brainly.com/question/5660386
#SPJ1
Answer:
Hope this helps
Explanation:
(iii) Delegated legislation is more flexible than an Act of Parliament. It can be passed quickly and easily amended or revoked, so that the law is up to date. Therefore, it allows rapid change. (iv) Delegated legislation helps in removing the difficulty clause and meet unforeseen emergencies expeditiously.
Answer:
See explaination
Explanation:
1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.
2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing
