All categories

3 years ago

Select all that apply.

History

2 answers:

Free_Kalibri [48]3 years ago

8 0

The fallacious arguments are:

The Civil War was about Northern businessman trying to bankrupt Southern farmers by emancipating their enslaving work force.

England developed a fair and just taxation system for the American Colonies.

Both sentences have fallacious arguments.

A fallacy is a wrong idea or a belief that is not true. In the case of the question, the first sentence is a fallacy because the Civil War was not about that argument. The Union wanted to have abolishment ideas that were not supported by the Confederated States. In the case of the second sentence, that is also a fallacy. The taxation system imposed by the English was not fair. It was a heavy taxation system that upset the colonies and that was one of the reasons to start the American Revolution.

Olenka [21]3 years ago

3 0

The Civil War was about Northern businessmen trying to bankrupt Southern farmers by emancipating their enslaved workforce.

England developed a fair and just taxation system for the American Colonies

The U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War was a rousing success.

You might be interested in

Negative feedback is most like

Llana [10]

Answer:

we definitely need some positive vibes

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Egypt is different from other Arab nations because

adelina 88 [10]

Answer: I think it's because it's not a rainy weather in there and it's had a triangle houses I guess that's how I say it !

Explanation: in my opinion that's the answer

6 0

3 years ago

Explain why Georg Simmel can be regarded as a micro-sociologist. Use a practical example from the economic institution of a soci

bixtya [17]

Answer:

Because his research was focused on the analysis of the social relationship between individuals in modern life and amidst all the constantly changing factors that society was experiencing.

Explanation:

Microsociology is the strand of sociology that seeks to understand the relationships between individuals that make up a society, in relation to the beliefs, values, feelings and behaviors that each individual has. Georg Simmel was a strong scholar of this, but he turned his studies to the analysis of modern life and the factors that modernity imposes on society. For this reason, he can be considered a micro-sociologist.

We can use as an example of something that would attract the attention of Georg Simmel for his studies, a society in which social agents act due to the economy, changing the relationship of society in relation to economic status and thus, generating malefic or beneficial consequences.

7 0

3 years ago

What were the French Protestants/Calvinists called? What were the English Calvinists called?

Alik [6]

The French Protestants/Calvinists became to be widely known as the Huguenots
The English Calvinists were called Puritans.

7 0

3 years ago

Compare and contrast the goals and actions of the leaders of the national assembly (1789-91) with those of the national conventi

pentagon [3]

The National Constituent Assembly (in French: Assemblée Nationale Constituante), was a revolutionary assembly in France that was formed during the very first years of the French Revolution. It was formed after the National Assembly (not to be confused with the National Constituent Assembly) dissolved. One of its main goals was to solve the economic crisis present in France, however their goals included several ideas from the enlightenment period, which include the following:

Equality before the law.
Due Process.
Natural rights: Liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
Sovereignty would reside in the nation.
Law is an expression of the general will.
Freedom of religion.
Freedom of speech.
Separation of powers.

Leaders of this assembly included Antoine Barnave, Georges Clemence, Henri Gregoire, Honore Gabriel Riquetti, Maximiliene Robespierre, among others. Despite their efforts, this assembly was not able to establish a democratic entity. It dissolved on 30 September 1791.

The National Convention (in French: Convention Nationale) was formed after the National Constituent Assembly, and the Legislative Assembly. Some of the main goals of this assembly included:

Determine the character and values of the new French Republic.
Cease internal and external threats to the revolution, partisan political tensions, and government officials.
Quell revolutionary violence.
Resolve the crippling debt crisis.
Determine the fate of Louis XVI
Determine whether or not to initiate a conflict with Austria.

One of the main problems within the National Convention was the constant inner conflict between the ideas and beliefs of the 3 main parties that formed the convention, the radical left 'Montagne', the right-wing 'Gironde', and the centrist 'Marais'. Each would have their own agenda and leaders, among which participated Phillipe Ruhl, Jerome Petion de Villeneuve, Jean-Francoix Delacroix, and Jean Baptiste Treilhard. Some leaders from past assemblies were also members, such as Maximiliene Robespierre, which was later arrested by the National Convention.

The convention dissolved in 1795 followed by the Corps Législatif.

I hope this helps. Happy holidays!

6 0

3 years ago