1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marissa [1.9K]
2 years ago
10

1. Which of the following would REQUIRE probable cause to be a legal search:

Law
2 answers:
zhenek [66]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

It would be E because they need probable cause to search the house.

Explanation:

B would not be correct because to pass the security check you must be searched.

C would be incorrect because officers can Search/Pat anyone down that they have stopped without probable cause.

D is not correct as the owner gives consent

A is incorrect because School Administrators only need reasonable suspicion.

VladimirAG [237]2 years ago
4 0
E it has to be atleast E
You might be interested in
Since Rodney took over as head of the division, he has challenged the status quo and guided adaptation. Rodney can best be descr
Alex

Rodney can best be described as a <u>Revolutionary-Crusader</u> leader as he challenged the status quo and has been guided by adaptation by taking over the position of the divisional head.

<h3>Who is a leader?</h3>

A leader is a person who sets an example for their subordinates and guides them well by applying one of the leadership styles.

Revolutionary-Crusader is one of the archetypes in leadership. It refers to a leader who has challenged the status quo, that is, the current scenario of social or political concerns, and advocated a sense of adaptation among people.

Therefore, Rodney has been viewed as a Revolutionary-Crusader leader in accordance with the leadership archetypes.

Learn more about the leadership archetypes in the related link:

brainly.com/question/14656651

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
A plaintiff sued a defendant for battery. At trial, the plaintiff's witness testified that the defendant had made an unprovoked
jasenka [17]

Answer: It is a proper question

Explanation:

The witness is making a claim about what had transpired between the defendant and the plaintiff and in order for their testimony to stand, they need to have integrity such that a reasonable person can believe their testimony in this case.

In asking about the false claim that the witness had once filed, the defendant is trying to establish that the witness has no integrity and so in proving their untruthfulness, the defendant hopes to convince the court that the witness does not have enough integrity to be a witness.

3 0
3 years ago
POV FREE POOINTS HACKER
Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:what?

Explanation: what are the points for?

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Gautreaux v. Chicago housing authority was a class action suit that alleged that public housing was, in effect.
borishaifa [10]

Gautreaux vs. Chicago Housing Authority class action lawsuit that alleged public housing was serving de facto govt. segregation. -gave $ to families to help buy homes in suburbs. as a result, happier, healthier, children had higher test scores.

About case :

The case began in 1966, when Dorothy Gautreaux and others filed a class action claiming that the Chicago Housing Authority (“CHA”) had intentionally perpetuated racial segregation both in its tenant assignment practices and in its siting policies.   In 1969, the district court found for the plaintiff class, Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Auth.,

Who is Dorothy Gautreaux?

Dorothy Gautreaux was a community and civil rights activist who lived in public housing on Chicago's South Side, and fought against their unjust policies. Under the guidance of ACLU lawyers, Gautreaux and 3 other residents sued the Chicago Housing Authority in the nation's first public housing desegregation lawsuit.

Learn more about Gautreaux vs. Chicago Housing Authority :

brainly.com/question/28161937

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
What immediately occurred to various States following the Supreme Court's decision in the Shelby County vs holder case, to strik
sammy [17]

Answer:

shrek is my favorite anime

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which Supreme Court case held that an officer may search a suspect to protect
    5·1 answer
  • Why is it it important to stop at traffic lights
    11·2 answers
  • What is the plaster of Paris? What kind of impression does it make? How is it used to list a tire or footwear impression?
    5·1 answer
  • Among other skills and attributes, attorneys should excel in critical thinking skills; communication skills such as listening, r
    12·1 answer
  • Write a 3-5 sentence essay answering the following question.
    13·2 answers
  • Is this true
    14·2 answers
  • the independent of the correlation with the environment answer in 5-20 sentences with barak obama and michael
    14·1 answer
  • I'm running low on points so there's not gonna be much points with this questions. Please help.
    10·2 answers
  • Discuss three contributing factors that led to human trafficking?​
    8·1 answer
  • What is an example of historiography?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!