How did genocide in Bosnia differ from genocide in Rwanda??

History

1 answer:

myrzilka [38]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

In Rwanda the cause of the genocide was “restoration of historical justice,” while in Bosnia it was more of a territorial and interfaith problem.

Explanation:

In the 1994 genocide, 800,000 people were killed in Rwanda. As a result of the three-year conflict in the former Yugoslavia, more than 100 thousand people died, and about two million were forced to leave their homes.

First, German and then Belgian colonists supported the power of the Tutsi. The reason was the origin of the Tutsi: Europeans reasoned that if this tribe used to live in northern Africa, it means that it is genetically closer to the Caucasian race and has superiority over the Hutus. The position of the Hutus was getting worse and more disenfranchised.

Simultaneously with the fall of the Soviet Union, many other communist regimes, including the Yugoslav one, shook. So, by 1991, Slovenia and Croatia withdrew from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. If the first of the republics resolved the issue of independence through a referendum, the second made a unilateral declaration of secession from Yugoslavia. Following the neighbors, Bosnia and Herzegovina decided to become independent, but the population of this republic was so heterogeneous that the proposed option did not suit everyone. The supporters of independent Bosnia and Herzegovina were mostly Bosnian Muslims, who made up almost half of the country's population, as well as Croat Catholics who did not want to follow the Orthodox Serbs, who made up about a third of the republic’s population.

You might be interested in

Native and English colonial groups traded many goods and ideas. Identify the goods and ideas Indians shared with the colonists

Svetllana [295]

Answer:

Furs and Animal skins, Native Farming techniques, free an uncultivated land.

Explanation:

The french and English fishermen were the first Europeans to trade with the native Americans. The fisherman who were fishing off the coast of northeastern Canada traded with the Indians, the Indians received European manufactured metal cooking utensils, cloth and guns. In return European used to get fur.

In those days fur was used in garments industry and was worn by the wealthy. Beaver fur was used to make belts and hats. The demand for fur was high in Europe but the beavers were extinct there, but it was plentiful in North America.

The fur trade was so lucrative that many fisherman stopped fishing and made voyages to North America solely to trade in furs, even before the area explorers such as Giovanni Cabot, Cartier and Christopher Columbus,Cabot, Cartier and Christopher Columbus.

They also helped the first English settlers by teaching them how to plant crops and survive on the land, but they were unaware that the colonialists wanted to colonise the lands. Hopi, Navajo and Cherokee tribes were expert farmers.

7 0

3 years ago

How did ancient Egyptians get paid?

Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer: Egyptian economy was based on barter, on the one hand because there was no currency.and on the other hand because certain painted scenes showed goods being exchanged in markets. so basically Trade

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which aspect of the Roman Catholic Church established in the 300s remains today?

Anon25 [30]

The pope is the Bishop of Rome and leader of the world-wide Catholic Church.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was Napoleon able to accomplish during peacetime?

diamong [38]

Napoleon accomplish: He created a code of laws, public education, set up a fairer tax code and stabilized the currency.