<span>a. Southern congressmen opposed the banning of slavery from the new territories
</span><span>Northern states and southern states were at odds over the potential spread of slavery in new states and what that would do to the balance of power in Congress. <span>
In 1846, Congressman David Wilmot of Pennsylvania introduced the proviso as an amendment to an appropriations bill in connection with the peace treaty being negotiated with Mexico. His amendment stipulated that any territory gained from Mexico would be free, not allowing slavery. Wilmot's amendment passed in the House of Representatives, but was unable to get approval in the Senate. The Compromise of 1850, a package of five bills passed by Congress in September of that year, sought to accommodate some of the issues both South and North were debating over during those years. But we know that war over the slavery issue was yet to come.</span></span>
Answer:
Popularity, social class, architecture
Explanation:
The ancient Egyptians thought pharoahs as gods themselves, similar to how many adore celebrities today. The Egyptians had a social class system related to money. The sandstone bricks used to make the pyramids and the sphinx are all exactly the same size, and to this day archaeologists couldn't figure out how they are the same size and shape.
Odoacer I think, Im not entirely sure
Answer:
The American Women performed as strategists and advocates in the Civil Rights Movement From The 1950s To the 1960s.
Explanation
During the period of the civil rights movement, American women also served in different capacities to ensure the Civil Rights Movement became a reality.
One of the crucial roles of the American women in the civil rights movement around the 1950s to 1960s was becoming a strategist and advocate.
They were involved in situations such as formulating educational programs to teach African American community people how to read and write. For example Septima Clark
Answer:
restriction of interest to a narrow sphere; undue concern with local interests or petty distinctions at the expense of general well-being.