After reading “The Nose”, one assumption that a reader might make about Russian culture is that Power and physical beauty are valued in Russia. They regard both equally, not one above the other.
<h3>What do you know about
Russian culture?</h3>
Russian literature, ballet, painting, and classical music are all deeply ingrained in its long and rich cultural history. In spite of what foreigners may think, Russia has a tremendously visual cultural history, from its vibrant folk clothes to its elaborate religious symbols.
In "The Nose," a St. Petersburg official's nose escapes his face and takes on a life of its own. The nose transforms into an independent, fully-fledged character that is significantly more powerful than its owner and does not want to acknowledge him.
Hence, the assumption that reader makes about Russian culture is Power and physical beauty are valued in Russia.
To know more about Russian culture refer: brainly.com/question/2154623
#SPJ10
Answer:
They were Mr. X's clothes and he found a small gold key.
I may be too late, but if you're looking for an ending, you should tie up a few loose ends, and leave it on a cliffhanger. If you're not allowed too, then you may want to tie [mostly] everything up. I'm sorry that I'm bad at writing..
The world's food supply may face problems in the years to come. There are many attempts to prevent future problems. The global community’s efforts to protect world food sources are solving existing problems through the development and improvement of crops and preservation of crops for future use.
To begin with, many improvements of crops were developed. “Tomatoes have been developed that rests frost and freezing temperatures…” (Source 2, paragraph 10). The aforementioned crop was genetically modified to have those features. The innovation and improvement led to crops that are able to survive harsh conditions, therefore more of them, can be harvested and distributed. “‘GM crops can improve yields for farmers, reduce draws on natural resources and fossil fuels and provide nutritional benefits’ according to...Monsanto” (Source 2, paragraph 20). Genetically modified crops are able to show multiple benefits. Since less natural resources and fossil fuels are used, GM crops create a more sustainable and better food source. This, with the improvements of crops, there is success in protecting world food sources. In contrary, other people may say that efforts to protect food sources are creating complications. Moreover, they might claim that genetically altered crops are not safe for your health or safe to eat. However, “‘Foods from genetically engineered plant...have not been more likely to cause an allergic or toxic reaction than food from traditionally bred plants’”, the FDA stated (Source 2, paragraph 21). This shows that genetically modified plants are just as safe for consumption as traditionally bred plants.
To continue with, the preservation of crops for future use is important. “‘To start scaling up the myriad weather related strategies...including harvesting existing seeds for future preservation…’” (Source 3, paragraph 31). In the case of a food shortage, communities should be ready and able to combat the problem. Being prepared for an emergency situation means creating a stable and reliable food source. “‘One way [we will adapt to future climates] is by tapping into this rich storehouse of diversity and breeding new crops with traits that allow them to succeed in [future] climates’” (Source 1, paragraph 6). Furthermore, this storage (the Svalbard Global Seed Vault) is a good safety for the world food source. Therefore, the storage and preservation of crop species equates to a secure and improved food source for the world.
In summary, the attempts made to protect food sources are solving problems. There are issues arising all over the world such as climate change. The community must prepare for these complications.
Hamlet, according to his discussion with Horatio in scene 1 page 9 favors death as an agent of freedom and equality.
Notice the inference he draws using Alexander the Great:
<em />
<em>Hamlet: </em><em>...isn't it possible...that the remains of Alexander the Great could be used to patch a hole in a barrel?</em>
<em />
<em>Horatio: </em><em>If you thought that, you'd be overthinking</em>
<em />
<em>Hamlet</em><em>: ...just follow the logic: Alexander dies, he is buried, and returns to dust. The dust is dirt, and dirt makes </em><em>mud</em><em> which we use to patch holes. Tell me why it is impossible that we might have used some dirt which used to be </em><em>Alexander?</em><em>....</em>
<em>The great emperor </em><em>Ceasar,</em><em> dead and turned to </em><em>clay</em><em>, may plug up a hole to keep the wind away...</em>
<em />
Hamlet's logic is simple. All men (great or small) are destined to die. But he employs the imagery of mud and dirt to further drive home the notion that if the bodies of the greats decayed and turned to dirt, as well as those of the poor and nameless, then death was indeed an equalizer.
Learn more about Hamlets No Fear in the link below:
brainly.com/question/484119
