Answer:
Social contract theory, nearly as old as philosophy itself, is the view that persons’ moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. Socrates uses something quite like a social contract argument to explain to Crito why he must remain in prison and accept the death penalty. However, social contract theory is rightly associated with modern moral and political theory and is given its first full exposition and defense by Thomas Hobbes. After Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the best known proponents of this enormously influential theory, which has been one of the most dominant theories within moral and political theory throughout the history of the modern West. In the twentieth century, moral and political theory regained philosophical momentum as a result of John Rawls’ Kantian version of social contract theory, and was followed by new analyses of the subject by David Gauthier and others. More recently, philosophers from different perspectives have offered new criticisms of social contract theory. In particular, feminists and race-conscious philosophers have argued that social contract theory is at least an incomplete picture of our moral and political lives, and may in fact camouflage some of the ways in which the contract is itself parasitical upon the subjugations of classes of persons.
Explanation:
People who generally respond well in a crisis believe they "can influence events".
Life can never be risk-free, yet you can accomplish more than any other individual to stay away from pointless dangers furthermore, to expand your capacity to adapt to conceivably hazardous circumstances. As indicated by inquire about on survivors of different kinds of disasters, the individuals who react well in an emergency tend to have three fundamental psychological characteristics:
They trust that they can impact occasions.
They can discover significant reason in disturbance and injury.
They realize that they can gain from both positive and negative encounters.
Well if you put the continents together, they kinda fit together like a puzzle piece.
Answer: Encourage an individual to form close bonds with their fellow peers.
Explanation:
Resocialization is a process used to change an individual's personality by applying drastic changes to their environment. This enables the individuals to function with desired behavior of different personalities. It breaks down any personal barriers and independence, then replaces this with a given identity. Resocialization is used in military training and the identity enforced is one that belongs to a unit or a team.
