I would try going with h =7/2 if that is wrong just rate me 1
Answer:
We don´t have at 95% of confidence, evidence to reject the publisher´s claim
Step-by-step explanation:
Population mean p₀ = 58 % or p₀ = 0,58
Hypothesis Test:
Null Hypothesis H₀ p = p₀
Alternative Hypothesis Hₐ p < p₀
For a significance level α = 0,05 means that CI = 95 % or CI = 0,95
z(c) = - 1,64
MOE = z(c)* √(p*q)/n
p - p₀ / √(p*q)/n = z(s)
And that z(s) is in the acceptance region
|z(s)| < |z(c)|
|z(s)| < 1,64
Then if that so we fail to reject H₀ . We don´t have evidence to reject the publisher´s claim
Yes it is the most simplified version
Answer:
631139.04 kilometers in 3 years
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x = how many kilometers she walk
y = time (minutes)
Since she walks 4km in 10 minutes.
x = 4, y = 10
(4,10)
But how many minutes if she walk only a kilometer? Divide x and y by 4.
(1,2.5)
She walks a kilometer under 2.5 minutes.
Now finding rate of changes.

Since m = 2.5
and of course, the function should be proportional so the equation should be y = mx.

Since time should be minutes instead of years.
Since 3 years = 1577847.6 minutes

Divide both sides by 2.5
