They are unrelated. Present day traditionalists are attached to guaranteeing that the Second Amendment was made so the nationals could oppose oppression and help battle to protect the Constitution, including the First Amendment. It wasn't. This is revisionist history. It was made to keep Congress and Congress alone from restricting the privilege to remain battle ready, which would keep the states from setting up local armies utilizing residents' weapons.
Actually, the states dependably had the ability to direct guns any way they needed, in light of the fact that at first, the Second Amendment didn't make a difference to them by any means. They likewise had the ability to confine discourse and the press et cetera, on the grounds that the First Amendment didn't have any significant bearing to them either.
The cause of the United States entering World War 1 in 1917 was because Germany sank their ship the Lusitania.
He managed to ensure the fight for independence. The wealthy Creole elites were controlled by the Spanish and they disliked it because they wanted to be the rulers of a new and independent country. Bolivar got their support which meant that they could now fight and get the independence that they wanted.
Answer:
i will help
Explanation: add a question and i will help