Answer: b. The duration of its liabilities must equal the duration of its assets
Explanation:
Since the company wants to structure its assets and liabilities such that its equity is unaffected by interest rate risk, then the duration of its liabilities must equal the duration of its assets.
It should be noted that when the duration of its liabilities is shorter than the duration of its assets, the duration gap is positive and when there's a rise in interest rate, the worth of assets will be affected more.
When duration of its liabilities is longer than the duration of its assets, the duration gap is negative and when there's a rise in interest rate, the worth of liabilities will be affected more.
Finally, when the duration of its liabilities is equal the duration of its assets, its equity is unaffected by interest rate risk.
It will help organize the flow of ideas
A I believe is the correct answer
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Because the injunction is the legal remedy that the special court's judge orders not the jury. The order enforce a party to do what must be done or refrains it from doing specific acts that harms the other party. So saying that Doorway sought the court injunction in which the jury decides the right course of action is incorrect because injunction is the warning of judge not of jury.
The project's projected NPV is $185.11. (second option)
<h3>What is the NPV?</h3>
Net present value is the present value of after-tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested. Only projects with a positive NPV should be accepted.
A project with a negative NPV should not be chosen because it isn't profitable. NPV is calculated by taking the present value of all cash flows over the life of a project. Then, the present value of cash flows is subtracted from the investment's initial investment
NPV = -1200 + 400 / 1.0975 + 425 / 1.0975² + 450 / 1.0975³ + 475 / 1.0975^4
= $185.11
To learn more about net present value, please check: brainly.com/question/25748668
#SPJ1