Answer:
Option B is correct one.
<u>Practicality</u>
Explanation:
Natasha addressed practicality in her persuasive speech on question of policy. Because she is talking about on-ground realities.
Answer:
The pertinent focuses for Dan Jacobs choice are referenced beneath.
- The new hardware would cost GreenLife $4,500,000
-
The new hardware would twofold the creation yield of the old apparatus
The expense of new hardware and the expansion in the creation yield by 100% are the future expenses and incomes and thus they are significant for dynamic.
The old apparatus is bought previously. Consequently, the price tag of the old apparatus is immaterial for dynamic procedure. Tho director ought to consider the resale estimation of old apparatus in the dynamic. Tho resale estimation of old apparatus ought to be deducted from the expense of new hardware so as to ascertain the net money surge to buy the new apparatus.
The director ought to set up an expense and advantage examination or ascertain NPV (net present estimation) of the venture (capital planning investigation) to introduce it before the leader of the organization. The extra costs identified with extra creation ought to likewise be thought of. This investigation would support the supervisor and the president in dissecting that whether they should buy the new machine or not.
Answer: $1639.3
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Bank A quotes a bid rate of $0.300 and an ask rate of $0.305 for the Malaysian ringgit (MYR) and that bank B quotes a bid rate of $0.306 and an ask rate of $0.310 for the ringgit.
The profit for an investor that has $500,000 available to conduct locational arbitrage goes thus:
Purchasing Malaysian ringgit (MYR) from bank A at the ask rate will be:
= $500,000/$0.305
= 1,639,344.3
Selling the Malaysian ringgit (MYR) at bank B based on the ask rate will be:
= 1,639,344.3 × 0.306
= $501,639.3
The profit for an investor that has $500,000 available to conduct locational arbitrage will be:
= $501,639.3 - $500,000
= $1639.3
Answer:
Line
Explanation:
The line organization is the organization structure in which the authority and responsibility are communicated from the top to bottom level of management so that the proper coordination could be done at each level of management i.e top, middle and lower.
Moreover, it is a two ways lines of responsibility i.e to be communicated from high to low level of management. Plus it would be reported to one supervisor only
