Answer:
Citizens should serve on juries to make a lot of money
Explanation:
Thats the answer i hoope iit helps
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
The answer is c. to trim off parts
C is the answer to ur question
The answer is b. Civil court because it isn’t a criminal matter so they wouldn’t go to criminal court meaning it can’t be a they are neighbors not family members so they wouldn’t go to family court so it isn’t c and it isn’t d because in order to go to appeals court you have to have already gone to court and the prompt does not state that they are appealing the verdict of a previous court case
