Answer:
(C) The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
Explanation:
State laws have more authority than local laws. For this reason, when a statuary law is sanctioned, it must replace existing local laws for the same subject. It is at this point that we can observe what the problem with the petition shown in the above question may be, making this petition circulating misleading to some readers.
Many cities, counties, and others have local smocking restriction laws that are much broader than the state law the petition wants to be sanctioned. Some people do not understand the relationship between state and local laws and will think this state law will help local smocking restriction law, when in fact state law will replace it.
It's purpose was to let people get good places in the government if they passed, but the only people that could take it were people that were already recommended into the government, so the rich and influential continued to run the government and the test was based on Confucianism.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Meena cannot be vaccinated because of her allergies, but she is protected to some degree from catching childhood diseases because of herd immunity.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The spread and contraction of a disease are subject to the characteristics of the disease. If the disease is contagious, it spreads rapidly.
- But if one stays away from infected persons of the from the agents causing the disease, his chances of contracting the disease reduce substantially.
- In Meena's case, 90% population in her community is free of the disease. Hence, the possibility of Meena contracting the disease is very less.
Because Germany <span>instituted its policy of unrestricted submarine warfare.</span>
They revolted against slavery. Napoleon Bonaparte led the revolution.