Well, before you start, you need to choose a side. If you are confused on the phrasing, it is simply asking:
Do you agree that the Supreme Court should be able to think of the law differently during a case to fit with current views?
After that, start thinking of why.
Yes, they should, the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to change as societal views changed.
No, they shouldn't, just because societal views are changing, what we need for our country to run smoothly is the same as it has been,
Hope I could help!
Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness are what he lists as "natural rights". I think he meant that every human should be born with these rights and they therefore "natural". He meant that these rights come with being human, and do not have to be earned.
Answer:
Type 1 incident
Explanation:
An incident usually considered as a 'type 1' if it possess huge threats for the lives of many people and could create a huge cost for the government in terms of property damage (Example of this would be huge wild fire, hurricane , massive flood, etc)
To handle type 1 incident, Government tend to utilize a groups of federally certified teams to handle the operation. (with much more training experience compared to local team). These federally certified teams will have access to large number of national resources with all Command and General Staff positions are activated,
Explanation: They wrote it because they wanted to establish self-government in the New World.
