1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ExtremeBDS [4]
4 years ago
5

How was the case of United States v. Stevens 2010 similar to the Marbury Madison case

History
1 answer:
Mama L [17]4 years ago
3 0

It challenged the power of judicial review but was unsuccessful. It was an example of the Supreme Court ruling a law unconstitutional. It challenged the power of judicial review and caused it to be revoked. It was an example of Congress amending the Constitution.

You might be interested in
In order to overcome his greatest obstacle to implementing his New Deal reform measures, President Franklin D. Roosevelt attempt
denpristay [2]

Answer:

increase the size of the Supreme Court so that he could appoint justices who would supply rulings favorable to him

Explanation:

The US Supreme Court first provoked public protests when, in May 1935, during an unprecedented economic crisis, the NIRA (National Industrial Recovery Act), which entered into force on June 16, 1933, was declared unconstitutional. This act became part of the New Deal of Roosevelt to save the country. Like other laws initiated by Roosevelt and adopted during the first “100 days,” the NIRA was extraordinary, well thought out and had one goal - to prevent huge social shocks that could cause an economic crisis at any moment. It was no accident that he was enthusiastically perceived by both businessmen and ordinary workers and employees of America.

However, the laws of the “New Deal” were literally passed in the 'fire order,' with the procedure for adoption curtailed, so the judges of the Armed Forces had arguments to declare them incompatible with the US Constitution. In January 1936, the Supreme Court’s decision abolished the AAA (Agricultural Adjustment Act) system, which was designed to save and restore the country's agriculture - imposing a tax on firms processing agricultural products, which, according to the judges of the Supreme Court, was contrary to the constitution.

In total, from January 1935 to May 1936, the US Supreme Court declared 11 laws that were passed by Congress in 1933-1934 as unconstitutional. The most important changes introduced by the New Deal in the life of American society were threatened, which caused widespread discontent among the population. The actions of the Supreme Court were opposed by the organized labor movement of America. The "revolutionary situation" began to ripen in the country. The presidential election in 1936 was a kind of referendum in favor of the “New Deal” by Roosevelt, turning the Supreme Court into an object of sharp criticism from the indignant public. Under these conditions, on February 5, 1937, Roosevelt sent a message to Congress on the plan of reform of the Supreme Court, which provided for a significant expansion of its composition. Although Congress did not accept the draft, it became apparent that the Supreme Court could no longer remain in its original position. Soon, the judges of the Supreme Court recognized the National Act on Labor Relations as constitutional. In May 1937, the Constitutional Law on Social Insurance was also successfully tested for constitutionality, and in 1939, also the Law on the Regulation of Agriculture of 1938. In essence, under pressure from the public, a legal 'amnesty' for the New Deal's socio-economic reforms took place.

3 0
4 years ago
What’s the enduring issue to the turning point of the Neolithic revolution and can you explain please!
nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:The Neolithic Revolution marked a major turning point in history. During it, many communities transitioned from hunting and gathering to farming and herding, providing them with a more stable food source and allowing their populations to grow.

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the economic system of manorialism work, and how did it affect peasants and nobles
kari74 [83]
Manorialism helped the two nobles and laborers by utilizing an exceptional framework. This framework is the point at which the ruler got sustenance and work in return for his security. 
Manorialism is where a ruler of the house would make the serfs or inhabitants take a shot at his domain or fief. The medieval times arrangement of manorialism was the association of a nation economy and society. Laborers had rights to utilize the land and space keeping in mind the end goal to live.
7 0
3 years ago
What organization did world powers create immediately after World War II
dolphi86 [110]
The United Nations....
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the Mughal Empire known for?
nikklg [1K]
I think it is C.) Brilliant architecture such as the Taj Mahal , whicg used domes decorated color tiles
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • "The use of mass production":
    7·2 answers
  • How did Jacob Riis’s photos in How the Other Half Lives influence American citizens? 12 points
    9·1 answer
  • Who helped found Maryland as a safe place for Catholics?
    13·2 answers
  • What happened on June 20 1943
    6·2 answers
  • What are the two mendicant orders, and who founded them?
    15·2 answers
  • On what points is Lincoln willing to agree with Douglas? On what points does he differ from Douglas?
    14·1 answer
  • What role did George Washington have at the constitutional convention?
    9·2 answers
  • What is one limitation of the freedom of petition?
    8·1 answer
  • Leader of the African National Congress who was jailed for 30 years. No links
    12·2 answers
  • What action did U.S president john F. Kennedy authorize to resolve this international conflict
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!