1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following is in the correct chronological order?

History
1 answer:
Brilliant_brown [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Is there any more to the problem?

You might be interested in
What conclusion can be drawn based on AT&T’s campaign donation records?
prohojiy [21]

Answer:

c. It favors Democratic candidates but also donates to Republicans.

Explanation: is correct

5 0
3 years ago
Name 3 things you learned about Hitler’s plan from the Crash Course video
timofeeve [1]
Seems that you may need to provide your own information that you’ve gained! you haven’t included the crash course video. i would recommend watching the video over and picking out 3 things that you learned. i’ve seen crash course videos before (not the one above of course) and they’re very easy to understand and there’s TONS of info, it’s quite easy to pick out three things :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe two steps taken by President Herbert Hoover to deal with the country's economic
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

He took protectionist measures

Explanation:

Hoover was nicknamed "do nothing" by the Democrats, it is not true that he did not try to solve the crisis but he definitely failed to solve it. He defended the Smoot-Hawley tariff which made the situation much worse.

6 0
3 years ago
Would you say that Hammurabi was a just king
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

He had the influence of his brother, the Sin-Muballit, in c., to be the Amorite King of the First Dynasty, in the Babylonian city State. 1792 before Christmas. There was a misunderstanding. So Hammurabi grew to his trone in an arduous diplomatic condition as the ruler of a small kingdom.

Explanation:

Answer is above

<em><u>Hope this helps.</u></em>

6 0
3 years ago
In your opinion, do you believe the
tekilochka [14]

Answer:

No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.

From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.

Explanation:

What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What political systems did the first settlers base their government upon?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the magnetic compass help traders?
    10·2 answers
  • The Ark of the Covenant is one of the most searched for artifacts in history. What was its purpose? What do you think happened t
    14·1 answer
  • What is the testimony of faith?
    11·1 answer
  • What was a reason many people emigrated from their homes?
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Mexican Cession impact politcs about slavery
    13·1 answer
  • HELP ME BEFORE MY TIME RUNS OUT
    7·2 answers
  • The controversy over the patriot act reveals the complications of balancing ________ with the ________.
    5·1 answer
  • What was the significance of Vaclav Havel being elected president of Czechoslovakia?
    7·2 answers
  • Is this statement true or false? The Battle of Antietam was the bloodiest single day of the Civil War.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!