Answer:
c. It favors Democratic candidates but also donates to Republicans.
Explanation: is correct
Seems that you may need to provide your own information that you’ve gained! you haven’t included the crash course video. i would recommend watching the video over and picking out 3 things that you learned. i’ve seen crash course videos before (not the one above of course) and they’re very easy to understand and there’s TONS of info, it’s quite easy to pick out three things :)
Answer:
He took protectionist measures
Explanation:
Hoover was nicknamed "do nothing" by the Democrats, it is not true that he did not try to solve the crisis but he definitely failed to solve it. He defended the Smoot-Hawley tariff which made the situation much worse.
Answer:
He had the influence of his brother, the Sin-Muballit, in c., to be the Amorite King of the First Dynasty, in the Babylonian city State. 1792 before Christmas. There was a misunderstanding. So Hammurabi grew to his trone in an arduous diplomatic condition as the ruler of a small kingdom.
Explanation:
Answer is above
<em><u>Hope this helps.</u></em>
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.