Answer:
He invited both groups and worked in arbitration.
Explanation:
The Strike carried out by the United Mine workers of America in the coalfields of Pennsylvania. Miners demanded for shorter workdays, higher wages and the recognition of their union. They also threatened to stop the coal supply to American cites. It was winter during the time of strike and most of the houses in US were heated with anthracite coal. To end the strike US Federal Government acted as a neutral arbitrator and the miners got 10 percent hike in their wages and the working hours were reduced from ten to nine hours. The owners also received a better price for their coal. It was the first dispute in which Federal government involved itself.
Answer: A: Someone who commits assault is beaten as punishment.
Explanation: I got it right on my Quiz
Based on the quote, critics of NAFTA might have claimed that:
A) Mexican workers would be unfairly taken advantage of
<h3>What can be deduced about the critics of NAFTA from the text?</h3>
The critics of NAFTA believe that Mexico was not as strong as the other countries who entered the trade agreement so the possibility that they will be taken advantage of was there.
Having read the above statement from the 1993 agreement of NAFTA, we can see that the reference to the United Mexican states must have proved that the union was needed to stand side by side with the American and Canadian states.
Critics might have believed that Mexico was vulnerable and could be unfairly taken advantage of in the deal.
Learn more about NAFTA here:
brainly.com/question/27372794
#SPJ1
The correct answer is 7.5.
k i think i got it now sorry
