Answer:
The reason why I personally disagree with this statement is that Mark Antony's speech wasn’t very good and the crowd was just written by Shakespeare to be suddenly convinced.
Explanation:
if you were to remove the easily swayed audience and replace it with a more objective audience,Mark Antony's speech would not still stand up as a convincing work of rhetoric.
The reason why I personally disagree with this statement is that Mark Antony's speech wasn’t very good and the crowd was just written by Shakespeare to be suddenly convinced. So I feel if the crowd were actually normal people the story could be different they wouldn’t be definitely so .
1- The correct answer is B.
The narrator could not believe what Miguel had said, so he run off to the park to investigate. When he arrived, he realized Miguel was correct: there were no traces of the carnival there: no holes where the spikes had been, no hay scattered about.
2- The correct answer is D.
The narrator's father was astonished because he believed that Miguel and the reporter were wrong. He could not understand how it could be possible for there to be no carnival in the area when he and everyone in town had been to one the night before.
Answer: B
Explanation: Douglass is not sad to leave the plantation, as he has no family ties or sense of home, like children usually have. He also feels he has nothing to lose, because even if his new home in Baltimore is full of hardship, it can be no worse than the hardships he has already seen and endured on the plantation.
If I am reading this correctly, you have been tasked with researching the "impact of perspective on historic events", meaning you will find how different thoughts and belief systems can impact historical events. Essentially, how do personal experiences, biases, beliefs, and/or attitudes affect the path of history?
In the materials, it shows you need a political figure's speech. These can often be found on YouTube or government websites. You will also need to editorials that review the figure's speech. These sources will be used as evidence for the essay component.
Your essay will have an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The introduction should incorporate your findings regarding perspective and its role in the selected speech. The first body paragraph will summarize the speech audio/film, while the second and third paragraphs will review the two selected editorials. The conclusion should evaluate any 'loose ends' between the editorials, in addition to your general ideas on perspective's role in history.
I hope that helps!
Answer:
everyone would feel closer to each other
