Societies balance individual and community rights with laws. There are laws that are written for individual people and there are also laws that are written for communities and larger groups of people. Both are written with the main idea of providing services to the people as well as the communities.
The steps in the PACED decision making model are define the problem, list alternatives, state criteria, evaluate alternatives, and make a decision.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u>Define the problem:</u> Identify what the problem is finding out how to solve it precisely.
<u>List alternatives:</u> Possibilities, solutions for the problems. There can be hundreds of alternatives in solving a Problem, it can be realistic or unrealistic. It’s up to an individual to choose the fastest and the most effective solution.
<u>State Criteria’s:</u> Criteria’s helps in judging the problem. Hence, we can have as many criteria’s we want, again it’s up to an individual how many criteria. He / She want to choose to solve the Specific problem. It’s one of the important factors because it helps us to peek & judge our best criteria and alternatives for solving the problem.
<u>Evaluate alternatives:</u> Its where we take the criteria & evaluate all our alternatives.
<u>Make decision:</u> Here we will look at the evaluation, criteria & alternative and add up the total. We should choose the best alternative we have the most realistic & logical alternative should be chosen to make a correct & most potent decision.
Answer: My understanding of Byzantium’s external and internal interactions has shifted significantly as a result of recent scholarship. The significance of this state to a millennium of developments throughout Eurasia has been examined; more importantly, the nature of contacts between Byzantium and its Eurasian neighbours has been reconceived. Models for understanding Byzantium’s interactions with its neighbours have moved from imperial centre and periphery, to ‘commonwealth’, to ‘overlapping circles’, to parallel and mutual developments in political and cultural identity. The Byzantine millennium now seems more connected, by commerce, diplomacy and common cultural heritage, than before. Artefacts and ideologies were acquired, appropriated or mediated amongst Byzantium and its neighbours in the Latin West, southeastern and central Europe, Iran and Dar al-Islam; even prolonged conflict did not preclude exchanges and indeed sometimes sprang from shared developments. At the same time, what we think of as the distinctively Byzantine milieu of Constantinople also interacted with regional cultures that at various times formed part of its empire. Coptic and Syriac cultures in Late Antiquity, Latin and Arabic regions in later periods, displayed both ambivalence and engagement with the culture of Constantinople and with its imperial and ecclesiastical leaders. As with Byzantium’s external connections, ‘centre and periphery’ models of internal interactions are giving way to more dynamic models seeing metropolis and regions as parts of broader, common developments. The conference aims to explore these developments.
Explanation: hope i helped it will be useful if you give Brainliest
<span>What makes you think "....Cold War a war no one could win...?" The Soviet Union no longer exists. WE DID WIN THE COLD WAR!?!?!?! </span>
Answer:
it doubled the size of the us
Explanation: