Answer:
Option 3 is the correct answer.
Explanation:
- In c, c++ or Java programming language, The for loop takes three parameters in which first is an initialization, second is condition check and the third is an increment. None of the other loop (except for loop) takes three parameters. The other loop takes only one parameter and that is the condition check.
- So when a user knows about the times of iteration then it is a good choice to use the for loop but when the person does not know about the times of iteration if the loop. It means the iteration of the loop is based on the condition then it is a good choice to chose while or Do-while loop.
- The above question wants to ask which loop for a user can best if he familiar with the iteration of the loop then the answer is for loop which is started from option 3. Hence Option 3 is the correct answer while the other is not because--
- Option 1 states about the do-while loop which takes condition only.
- Option 2 states about the while loop which also takes condition only.
- Option 4 states about the infinite loop which is not any loop.
- Option 5 states about none of these which is not correct because option 3 is the correct answer.
Explanation:
I don't really understand what you're trying to get at, maybe try to abbreviate a little more?
Answer:
Information and communications technology is an extensional term for information technology that stresses the role of unified communications and the integration of telecommunications and computers, as Technology Trends 2016
#1: Spreading intelligence throughout the cloud. ...
#2: Self-managing devices. ...
#3: Communication beyond sight and sound. ...
#4: Fundamental technologies reshaping what networks can do. ...
#5: Weaving security and privacy into the IoT fabric.
Explanation:
look for a question that i have answered answer it and also plz give me brainliest on this one plz
Answer:
The fundamental limitation of symmetric (secret key) encryption is ... how do two parties (we may as well assume they are Alice and Bob) agree on a key? In order for Alice and Bob to communicate securely they need to agree on a secret key. In order to agree on a secret key, they need to be able to communicate securely. In terms of the pillars of IA, To provide CONFIDENTIALITY, a secret key must first be shared. But to initially share the key, you must already have CONFIDENTIALITY. It's a whole chicken-and-egg problem.
This problem is especially common in the digital age. We constantly end up at websites with whom we decide we want to communicate securely (like online stores) but with whom we there is not really an option to communicate "offline" to agree on some kind of secret key. In fact, it's usually all done automatically browser-to-server, and for the browser and server there's not even a concept of "offline" — they only exist online. We need to be able to establish secure communications over an insecure channel. Symmetric (secret key) encryption can't do this for us.
Asymmetric (Public-key) Encryption
Yet one more reason I'm barred from speaking at crypto conferences.
xkcd.com/177/In asymmetric (public key) cryptography, both communicating parties (i.e. both Alice and Bob) have two keys of their own — just to be clear, that's four keys total. Each party has their own public key, which they share with the world, and their own private key which they ... well, which they keep private, of course but, more than that, which they keep as a closely guarded secret. The magic of public key cryptography is that a message encrypted with the public key can only be decrypted with the private key. Alice will encrypt her message with Bob's public key, and even though Eve knows she used Bob's public key, and even though Eve knows Bob's public key herself, she is unable to decrypt the message. Only Bob, using his secret key, can decrypt the message ... assuming he's kept it secret, of course.
Explanation:
