Answer:
Face Value of the Bond = 40000
Effective Interest = 4%
Coupon rate = 4%
Years to Maturity = 4
Quarterly Coupon rate = 1%
No. of compounding periods = 16
Present Value of Face (40000*.85282) $34,112.85
Present Value of Interest Payments (800*14.7179) <u>$5,887.15</u>
Total $40,000.00
Face Value of Bond <u>$40,000.00</u>
Initial Amount of Discount/(Premium) <u>$0.00 </u>
Note: As the bonds are issued at par, there is premium or discount.
Answer:
Final Value= $51,312.68
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Monthly deposit= $150
Interest rate= 0.06/12= 0.005
Number of months= 9*12= 108
First, we need to calculate the future value of the first investment. We will use the following formula:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= monthly deposit
FV= {150*[(1.005^108)-1]} / 0.005
FV= $21,410.99
The second part of the investment:
Number of years= 15
Annual interest rate= 6%
<u>I will assume that the interest rate is annually compounded now. </u>If this is not the case, just change the interest rate (0.005) and "n" (15*12=180)
We need to use the following formula:
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
FV=21,410.99* (1.06^15)
FV= $51,312.68
Answer:
$248,000
Explanation:
According to the historical cost principle, the fixed assets should be recorded at the purchase price or the acquired price.
Since in the question it is mentioned that the land is purchased from Lear inc for $248,000 and the other transactions are also there
So here the land should be recorded at the purchase price i.e. $248,000
Answer:
Asset
Balance Sheet
Expense
Income statement
Explanation:
An asset is defined as a property of company, from which future economic benefits will arise, as for inventory in hand, the inventory can be sold in future and then future benefits will arise from such sale. Thus, it is an asset and assets are reported in balance sheet.
The expenses are the cost associated to earn the revenue, as when any inventory is sold the inventory is recorded as an expense called cost of goods sold, which is recorded in income statement.
Answer:
a. If two similar properties are for sale, a buyer will purchase the cheaper of the two.
Explanation:
The principle of substitution justifies the idea that the maximum value of a property will be set by the selling price of an equally valuable and desirable substitute property. In this case of property sale, if an area has two similar houses and one is being sold for $912,000 and the other is priced at $105,000, buyers will most likely go for the cheaper one. There is no reason to pay more money if they will be getting a similar property at low cost.
