Answer:
$14,900
Explanation:
not-for-profit organization will report the investments at the fair value of the investments end of year, in the year-end statement of financial position.
Here,
Investment Fair value (end of year)
Stock A (100 shares) $51
Stock B (200 shares) $49
Stock A = (100 * 51) = $5,100
Stock B = (200 * 49) = $9,800
Total Investment fair value at end of year = $14,900
$14,900 will be the amount reported in stock investments in the year-end statement of financial position.
Answer:
$13,000
Explanation:
Most property purchased during 2019 and beyond, may be expenses using Section 179 tax deductions. The limit for 2019 was $1 million and that is way more than $13,000. Section 179 is one of the few benefits that small business got from the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, and it can be really useful.
Businesses can deduct the full purchase price of qualifying equipment (used manufacturing equipment qualifies) as long as it was purchased after January 1, 2019. This is an incentive created to encourage businesses to buy more equipment and invest more.
Answer:
3 years
Explanation:
The computation of the payback period is shown below:
Payback period = Initial investment ÷ Net cash flow
where,
Initial investment is $15,000
And, the net cash flow would be
= Year 1 + year 2 + year 3 + year 4
= $5,000 + $5,000 + $5,000 + $5,000
= $20,000
As we see that the net cash flow is recovered in three years that means net cash flows and the initial investment are equal
So,
Payback period would be
= $15,000 ÷ $15,000
= 3 years
Expected profit is the probability of receiving a profit multiplied by the profit
So
Strong 50,000 * .30 = 15,000
Moderate = 10,000 * .60 = 6,000
Recession = -50,000 * .10= -5,000
Add those up, and you should expect a profit of around 16,000
Answer:
False
Explanation:
An economic agent should specialise in the production of the good for which it has a comparative advantage in its production.
An economic agent has a comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other economic agents.
Anne's opportunity cost in pie production = 4/3=1.33
Anne's opportunity cost in shirt production = 3/4 = 0.75
Mary's opportunity cost in pie production = 5/2 = 2.5
Mary's opportunity cost in shirt production = 2/5 = 0.4
Anne has a comparative advantage in the production of pies and Mary has a comparative advantage in the production of shirts.
Anne should specialise in pie production and Mary should specialise in shirt production.
I hope my answer helps you
