All categories

2 years ago

In the following conversation, which discussion technique does Anna most clearly show?

2 answers:

7 0

In this conversation, Ana explains certain public confidence, in which she does not ask any questions to substantiate her claim, the fourth option offered is excluded. She does not deny the existing ideas, because she only lists the facts in the article, which excludes the first option. She does not synthesize all the existing claims, since she alleges all the claims and possibilities with the same probability, and the third option is excluded. Anna simply lists all the evidence to support the claims and conclusions,

The answer is: B.

Harrizon [31]2 years ago

4 0

B. using evidence to support your conclusion.

You might be interested in

Use the following passage to answer the question. (1) Water is something most of us take for granted. (2) If we need a cold drin

Studentka2010 [4]

I believe it is sentence number 13

4 0

2 years ago

. Rewrite the sentences. Use the Second Conditional. 1) I haven’t got any money, so I won’t buy that CD. ____If I had some money

mina [271]

Answer:

2) If pigs had wings, they would fly.

3) If he worked hard, his marks would be good.

Explanation:

Second conditional is a structure that expresses an impossible (or highly unlikely) situation. In other words, it expresses a condition that can't be met.

The structure of the second conditional is as follows:

- main clause (the condition) contains "if" and verb in past tense

- the other clause contains would+verb construction.

So, these are rewritten sentences:

2) If pigs had wings, they would fly.

3) If he worked hard, his marks would be good.

If we write the "if" clause first, we need to separate it with a comma, otherwise we don't.

4 0

2 years ago

What principle does this demand curve demonstrate

Yakvenalex [24]

how the quantity that a person will demand varies depending on the price of a good or service.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Match these vocabulary terms with their definitions. Match the items in the left column to the items in the right column. 1 . im

enot [183]

Answer:

1. impetuous - acting suddenly with little thought; impulsive

2. tedious - tiresome; boring; irksome

3. perseverance - the quality of being persistent in the face of difficulties

4. livelihood - means of providing for cost of living

5. stamina - endurance; resistance to fatigue

6. zealot - one of a Jewish sect who struggled openly against Roman rule

7. instability - lack of firmness of purpose; changeableness

Explanation:

1. An impetuous person is someone who acts quickly, without much thought or consideration for what he is about to do;

2. We call tedious something or someone that is monotonous, boring, long or slow;

3. Perseverance is the determination to keep on doing something in spite of difficulties and challenges;

4. Livelihood refers to whatever it is that is necessary to make a living, to secure the necessities of life;

5. If someone's stamina is good, that means that person has great physical and mental endurance, being capable of prolonged effort;

6. A zealot was someone belonging to a Jewish political movement against the Roman Empire;

7. Finally, instability refers to the quality or state of being unstable. It can refer to something physical as well as mental.

4 0

2 years ago

What does the young man hope to do in his life?

MrRa [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

shnsjsjsjuwuwndbnwiw

4 0

2 years ago