Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's because Darry slapped
Answer:
The answer is B: Scientists are confused by the different ways the rocks move, and the theories involving wind, ice, and mud have not been proven.
Explanation:
In the second paragraph, it is said that scientists have been baffled by the variety of rock movement. Then, there was a description of their movement and some possible reasons for why it happens. Some of the reasons(wind, ice and mud) were suggested by scientists. The paragraph then ends by saying that none of the theories have been confirmed by research.
This is conveyed very well by option B therefore it the correct option as the main idea of the paragraph.
Answer:
1. Outer Story- B.the interpretation and response of the actors within the story
2. Inner story- A.brings ideas and principle down to earth for clarity
3. Concrete Language- D.objective events and circumstances in the situation
4. Figurative Language- E.portrays one thing in terms of another
5. Descriptive Language- C.adds color and precision to the picture by using modifiers
Explanation:
- The outer story in a writing refers to the external factors in a story that is visible to the audience such as the actors in the play, the place where the story occurred, at what time the event happened, and what actually happened. It sets the story in motion and gives it a sense of direction.
- The Inner story is the deeper meaning of the story. It is the lesson the reader takes away from the entire story and the effect of the events on the reader.
- Concrete Language provides a sound and objective understanding of the story, also supplying specific details that shape the reader's understanding of the story.
- Figurative Language is a type of language that uses words in such a way that is unconventional to provide a deeper meaning to the story being told.
- Descriptive Language refers to language that paints a clearer picture of an event, by appealing to the senses of touch, sight, smell, hearing, and taste.
Well, there could be many reasons. First off, there are many different historical and cultural differences between Shakespeare's time and modern times that a modern student doesn't pick up on, doesn't understand.
Second, you simply have to take into account the fact that, with modern technology, students' attention spans have gotten so bad that simply reading Shakespeare plays is "too boring" for them.
Modern students want quick answers, a bubble they can circle on a multiple choice test type of answer. Interpreting Shakespearean plays requires thought and critical thinking, things that, I'm sorry, but no students seem to use nowadays.
Also, there is the small fact that, especially amongst teenage males, things like plays and reading Shakespeare are labeled as feminine or "gay".
This fact alone is not enough to avoid the accusation of plagiarism because plagiarism is a very wide subject that can not be satisfied only by the addition of the references of the sources one used during writing.
Plagiarism is defined as the practice of using another person's work or idea and presenting them as if they are your own. Plagiarism encompasses the following acts:
1. Using sources without citing them.
2. Not using appropriate in-text citations in one's write up.
3. Improper paraphrasing of other people's words, that is, those words are still basically in the form used by the original user.
4. Not including quotation marks when other people's words are used.
5. Failure to acknowledge all authors, in case the source used was put together by many authors.
These are just few examples of what constitute plagiarism, so you can see that it is more than just adding references to your write up.<span />
