I think it is a, correct me if im wrong
Adam Smith (1723 – 1790) was a Scottish economist. He was deeply critical of Christianity because of his own observation of hypocrisy within Protestantism.
In 1759, Smith published The Theory of Moral Sentiments, which established Smith’s reputation in his own days, is concerned with the explanation of moral approval and disapproval. He based his explanation on sympathy as a fundamental human motive.
In 1776, he published The Wealth of Nations that became the foundation of modern economics.
There has been considerable controversy as how far there is contradiction between Smith’s emphasis on sympathy in his <em>Theory of Moral Sentiments</em> and the key role of self- interest in <em>The Wealth of Nations</em>.
Smith’s idea of letting an economy without government intervention, called today Laissez faire was not about the government granting special economic privileges to powerful manufacturers and merchants. Mercantile monopolists and their allies in Parliament today, are the great enemies of Smith’s “free market mechanism”.
Your answer should be C. To provide military protection for other colonies. <u><em>ThoughtCo.com</em></u> says "Its goal was to protect South Carolina and the other southern colonies from possible Spanish incursions. In fact, no prisoners were amongst the first settlers to the colony in 1733. Instead, the inhabitants were charged with creating a number of forts along the border to help protect against invasion." Good luck!
The results were that the European crusade was defeated in Anatolia. It’s supposedly said that the Byzantine Emperor Manuel I Komnenos had ordered Turks to attack the Europeans. Louis and Conrad with all the remaining members made it to Jerusalem and attacked Damascus, which ended in defeat. It was a big win for the Muslims though. This was the start of the fall of Jerusalem and then led to the Third Crusade at the end of the 12th century
