Answer:
Yes they are sustainable
Explanation:
The strategies mentioned in the question were laid out my Michael Porter and therefore, we can look analyse his model to understand whether these strategies are sustainable or not.
Porter has categorized strategies into 3 broad categories: Cost Leadership, Differentiation, and Focus strategies (all three are known as "Generic Strategies). Focus strategy is branched out into two sub-segments known as Cost Focus and Differentiation Focus.
Now, the question has already clarified that the strategies in question are both focus strategies. So lets understand what each entails.
Differentiation Focus: A strategy in which the company aims to gain market leadership in a focused market (a specific market) through strategic differentiaion. This strategic differentiaion involves offering a specialized service or a unique product in a niche market. Cost focus strategy is similar in the sense is that that the aim is to offer highly low cost products/services to a niche market. Because of the focus on these niche markets, company's develop a strong understansing of the consumer thereby developing strong brand loyalty with that particular customer base. The key ingredient, again, is that the competitive advantage is being harnessed by focusing just on a particular niche market. Another key component is that the companies using this strategy rely on the consumers in the target market having different needs, tastes, and requirements than consumers in other segments in the industry.
Now, these strategies by desig were put forth my Porter has being sustainable. Hence the term "generic strategies" in that they can be broadly used to create and sustain performance. The focus strategies as defined above are sustainable since they harness the power of having priority knowledge of their target market to provide appropriate services and products. The high brand loyalty and knowledge of consumers give them an edge over competitors (competitive rivalry). Supplier power depends on the nature of products being offered therefore it cant be taken into consideration. Buyer power can be managed since you are prodiving unique service offerings to unique customers. Threat of substitution depends on the product and service offering. Threat of new entry by larger player exists, but due to the focus that the company had in the target market, barriers to entry (long strong brand loyalty) can be developed.
Answer:
b. 3,249 units
Explanation:
Step 1. Given information.
Fix costs are 32.000
Depreciation expense 9.700
Contribution margin 9.85
Step 2. Formulas needed to solve the exercise.
Break even point = Fixed cost / contribution per unit
Step 3. Calculation.
Break even point= $32.000/$9.85= 3,248.73 rounded to 3,249
Step 4. Solution.
3.249 units is the minimum number of units to ensure its potential loss does not exceed the desired level
Option B is correct i.e. 3.249 units
Answer:
Depends on what you define as small business, if you mean a mom and pop pharmaceutical store across the road that keeps the money within the family and has every member of the family working in the shop to create an infinite amount of revenue for themselves until they hit a profit, then sure. They contribute tax dollars to the community through supplying jobs and creating cheaper cost for locals, which gives incentive to buy more in bulk and thus creating more tax dollars. Unless you are talking about the man in the apartment building who makes home grade meals and sells them cheap to his community, then no. While he is contributing tax dollars all those dollars aren't going back into the community until he buys something with that money, and the people who spent that money just got a tax free meal that 't go into the community didn't.
Explanation:
I think this is an example of self-serving bias. This is the tendency of people to attribute positive outcomes to personal factors, but attribute negative outcomes to external factors such as other people. The reason people have this tendency because personalizing success or positive outcomes helps their self-esteem.
The inflation rate formula is ( CPI2 - CPI1 )
-------------------- x100
CPI1
CPI2 = Price of the latter date
CPI1 = Price of the earlier date
So the latter price is $32.7 and the earlier is $32 (I'm assuming you mean the inflation from January to February)
Then plug in the numbers ( 32.7 - 32 )
---------------- x100
32
32.7 - 32 = .7/32 = .021875 x 100 = 2.1875
Which means the answer would be if you round 2.2%
