Hey there.......
the answer is .........
raises
hope it helps
extra info: The inflation gap is a Negative function of the unemployment gap. Expectations eliminate the effectiveness of the policy.
more
When decelerating below long-run trend growth, stimulate it with expansionary policy.
Answer:
It will purchase at the local store at an economic cost of $123
Explanation:
Answer:
It will puchase the skirt across town as it has the less economic cost.
Explanation:
We are going to add up the opportunity cost (lost wages) to the cost of the skirt:
place travel-time Price Cost to travel Economic Cost
local store 30 $ 102.00 $ 21.00 <u> $ 123.00 </u>
across town 60 $ 85.00 $ 42.00 $ 127.00
neighboring city 120 $ 76.00 $ 84.00 $ 160.00
*travel-time we multiple the time it took each eway by 2
**The cost to travle will be Juanitas wages per hour ($42) times the travel-time/ 60
That's because the wages are express in hours and the travel time in minutes so we convert into hours
Then, the economic cost is the sum of the value of the skirt and the lost wages.
<em>Juanita, as a rational consumer will chose to purchase at the lower cost.</em>
Answer:
A. Performing stage
Explanation:
Performing stage is that stage in which the team members know each other clearly and there is a lot of cooperation and consensus amongst them.
The team is committed toward the teams's missions and how to achieve it. Hence the team is more like an problem solving team with combined efforts.
I hope this helps.
Thank You.
Answer:
A) change in the cost of eating index = <u>20% increase</u>
B) Suppose that consumers are completely indifferent between two chickens and one ham. For this example, how large is the substitution bias in the official "cost-of-eating" index?
The <u>INCREASE</u> in the cost-of-eating index is <u>18</u> %.
The <u>OVERESTIMATE</u> of inflation in the cost of eating reflects substitution bias.
Explanation:
2015
product units unit cost total
chickens 30 $4 $120
hams 10 $5 $50
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $250
2016
product units unit cost total
chickens 30 $5 $150
hams 10 $7 $70
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $300
A) ($300 - $250) / $250 = 20%
B)
if consumers are indifferent for 2 chickens per 1 ham, then the new basket should be assuming consumers will purchase the cheapest option:
2016
product units unit cost total
hams 25 $7 $175
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $255
the increase in inflation would have been = ($255 - $250) / $250 = 2%
the substitution bias = reported inflation - real inflation = 20% - 2% = 18%
