Many Americans were satsified with the Article of Confederation because it gave states more rights and the government less.
Answer: hope it helps :)))))))
Explanation:
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached among state delegates during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. Whether and, if so, how slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for legislative representation and taxing purposes was important, as this population number would then be used to determine the number of seats that the state would have in the United States House of Representatives for the next ten years. The compromise solution was to count three out of every five slaves as people for this purpose. Its effect was to give the Southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignored, but fewer than if slaves and free people had been counted equally
Answer: Perform experiments to test your hypothesis.
Explanation:
Experiments and hypotheses go hand-in-hand. Hypotheses, which are proposed explanations for scientific observations,
Experiments are designed based on the measurable variables defined in a given hypothesis.
Answer:
b. Should prison inmates be offered the opportunity to earn high school or
college degrees, receive job training, and prepare for a future, productive
life outside of prison?
I believe prison inmates should be offered the opportunity to study or receive job training because those opportunities could make a change in their life outside of prison. Their futures could be better just because they got the opportunity to use the time in prison to educate themselves. Education is never wrong and also it is also beneficial for the rest of the society if the prison inmates are productive outside of prison and they do not continue committing crimes.
Explanation:
In this exercise, you have to select one of the questions and then write about it. I chose to write about question "b". It is important to give your opinion on the question you choose to answer but also inform yourself so what you answer makes sense and is related to the reality of prison inmates and society.
Answer with Explanation:
The evaluation of every matter requires a framework based on a useful ideas that are required for a better judgement for deriving a solution like if we want to resolve a mathematical problem, then we will use mathematical functions like +, -, *, etc so that we are able to solve the question because these are the ideas that are based on a useful ideas (Logic). Likewise when we want to assess whether the argument is good or not, we will require an ethical standard framework to evaluate the good in the argument.
So yes, I agree that ethics is an essential element of a good argument because it is the framework which decides which argument is good or not. These ethical values in a particular argument is a move from not good to good argument. Greater the ethical values in an argument the more is the argument good as per ethical principles.
