1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
worty [1.4K]
3 years ago
11

The 2017 population of California was 39536653 and of Arizona was 7016270. Compute and compare the rate of pedestrian fatalities

per 100,000 residents.
Mathematics
1 answer:
jasenka [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The pedestrian fatality rate for California per 100,000 residents would be;

= (858/39,536,653) * 100,000

= 2.17 people per 100,000

In Arizona that figure is;

= (216/7,016,270) * 100,000

= 3.08 people per 100,000

<em>This shows that even though California has a higher number of pedestrian fatalities in absolute terms, when this figure is made relative to population, Arizona has more pedestrian fatalities. </em>

You might be interested in
In general, what can you conclude about a pair of angles that are both congruent and supplementary?
dem82 [27]

Answer:

Both angles are right angles.

Step-by-step explanation:

Supplementary angles sum to 180°. Since we know that both angles are congruent, let's call them x and x. We can write the following equation:

x + x = 180

2x = 180

x = 90°

Therefore, we can conclude that both angles are right angles.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Writing in Math Stacy multiplied 5 x 9 and said the nswer was 44. What two patterns could you use to show nat her answer is not
marusya05 [52]

Answer:

5*9= 45

Step-by-step explanation

Well using your hands you can put down your fifth finger and that will give you four fingers on the left and five on the right that then equals 45

6 0
3 years ago
A system of equations is shown below.
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

6, 0

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Jerry multiplied 3.04 x 7.091 and got the product 2.155664. Is his answer reasonable? Why or why not?
Readme [11.4K]

First we multiply the numbers ignoring the decimal and then place the decimal in the position

3.04 *7.091 = 2155664

Now the first number has two digits after the decimal and the second number has three digits after the decimal.

Therefore in the final result we have to move the decimal (2+3) =5 place from the left,

So the answer would be 21.55664

So, the correct answer is 21.55664

Jerry calculated the answer correctly , but made an error in the placement of the decimal point.  The answer is not reasonable because 2.155664 and 21.55664 mean two completely different answer far apart from each other


6 0
3 years ago
Please answer the following:
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

26 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

convert 4 5/12 into 53/12

multiply 53/12 by 6 to get 53/2

turn 53/2 into a mixed number = 26 1/2

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Let y = 4t + 2 be a linear function representing the distance from home for an ant t minutes after starting out from a location
    6·2 answers
  • How do u solve 13 5/9 - 8 1/6?
    9·2 answers
  • paden payes $2.10 for 5 1/2 pounds of bananas. Alyssa pays $3.25 for 6 1/2 of bananas. Which is the better buy
    8·1 answer
  • HELP HELP !! 5(-3x - 2) - (x - 3) = -4(4x + 5) + 13
    6·1 answer
  • 1×100,000+3×10,000+9×1,000+8×100+5×10+2×1 whats the area in standard form and word form?
    14·1 answer
  • If Jani has<br> 2oo and spendo<br> 850 how much<br> Will She have?
    11·1 answer
  • 3×2+4×5=70 prove it's true by adding a bracket​
    6·1 answer
  • 5x+y=4<br><br>i don't know what to do here.​
    13·2 answers
  • The probability of an event is 4:5. What is this probability expressed as a decimal?
    14·1 answer
  • Solving proportions
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!