Answer:
A. filling in missing parts.
Explanation:
The question above is related to the subject, "Psychology." This is related to the "Law of Closure" of the<em> Gestalt Law</em>. This is an illusion that we create by <u>filling in the missing parts whenever we see objects that are broken.</u> So even if a circle has a missing part <em>(incomplete stimulus),</em> we tend to see it <em>(unconsciously)</em> as a whole or as a completely closed circle despite having gaps in between.
Both example one and two are civil cases. Civil cases are those that involve contracts and/or wrongful or negligent acts resulting in the private wrong, damage, or injury of someone or something.
State court has original jurisdiction over both examples due to both dealing with local citizens. If appealed, both cases may go before the federal court due to the question of infringement on constitutional rights in each example.
I believe the answer is: <span> preservation of evidence.
</span><span> preservation of evidence is critically important because the genetic Trace or fingerprints that left on the evidence could be easily erased.
When such evidence is erased, the justice department wouldn't have sufficient proof when they are prosecuting the suspects.
</span>
Yea yea yea yea yea yea yea yea yea Yea yea yea yea yea yea yea yea yea
Answer:
The correct answer is: Self-efficacy.
Explanation:
Self-efficacy can be understood as the subjective feeling that one is capable of complying with the demands that our context presents to us.
Is a general perception that one is competent in the tasks that are given to us, be it academic demans, job related duties, family responsabilities and so on.
A self-efficient person believes themselves to be capable of succeding and see life challenges as interesting rather than stressful events.
In this particular case, Andrea, a sales executive believes that she has the competence to achieve her monthly sales target. Andrea best demostrates self-efficacy in this scenario.