I think that it’s b because it’s kinda like what goes along with the question and what makes sense the most!!!!!
Answer:
To assert that legal segregation is harmful to children.
Explanation:
This purpose can be backed from the following lines from the excerpt:
Quote, "... their race generates a feeling of inferiority... for [because of] the policy of separating the races is usually interpreted as denoting the inferiority of African Americans".
To create artificial separation creates artificial rifts between what the students of different races may distinguish between the possible as well as that which they cannot achieve. In this, if there is a outwardly limiting factor that is not controlled by the student itself but by the state, it would create a societal boundary that would, quote, "affect the motivation of a [African American] child to learn".
Answer: Option (C). It was a trio of Georgia Democrats that controlled the Georgia state
government.
Explanation: Bourbon Triumvirate consisted of Joseph Brown, Alfred Colquitt, and John Gordon. These three individuals controlled the Georgia State government, they are the three most powerful and prominent politicians in their era, these three men influences the United States of America senate and the governors office. However these men all wanted stronger economic ties with the Industrial North. But they insisted they wanted to keep some southern traditions such as white supremacy.
Answer: A. a disagreement between the states over representation in Congress.
The main disagreement was over whether representation would be the same for all states, or based on a state's population size. Then there was also a question, for basing representation on population size, about whether slaves counted in a state's population or not.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise were worked out during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 in order to resolve these issues.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. Initially, a unicameral (one-chamber) legislature was envisioned. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
I think it’s the theme is that as long as you keep doing good , or trying you will get a positive outcome .
