1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nasty-shy [4]
3 years ago
13

without the support of the African slave trade, how well would Great Britain‘s economy policy have worked? Explain your response

.
History
2 answers:
lisov135 [29]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Without the support of the African space trade, Great Britain's economy policy would not have worked simply because Britain would not have been viable without the trade and use of slaves.

Gekata [30.6K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Great Britain's economic policy, mercantilism, required that the country export more goods than it imported. For this to happen, Britain needed to maintain its status as the world's strongest industrial power. Britain did this by acquiring colonies overseas. It was motivated to do this because it needed new markets for its finished goods. The colonies could also be used to supply raw materials for manufacturing.

Was the African slave trade necessary for Great Britain's economic policy to work?

print Print document PDF list Cite

Expert Answers info

DEBORAH SHELDON eNotes educator | CERTIFIED EDUCATOR

Great Britain's economic policy, mercantilism, required that the country export more goods than it imported. For this to happen, Britain needed to maintain its status as the world's strongest industrial power. Britain did this by acquiring colonies overseas. It was motivated to do this because it needed new markets for its finished goods. The colonies could also be used to supply raw materials for manufacturing.

The trouble with the colonies is that after the British economy became prosperous, British nationals did not desire to move to these locations, which were in inhospitable climes. This is where the slave trade becomes a factor. Because the colonies were primarily established to provide particular cash crops, which required numerous workers, slaves were utilized to make them profitable. The slave trade itself was also a very lucrative endeavor. Due to the need to make colonies profitable to increase industrial trade, Britain was closely tied to the Atlantic slave market. So to answer the initial question, Britain's economic policy was probably not viable without the trade and use of slaves.

You might be interested in
Slaves in the south worked in all of the following EXCEPT: a. banks c. iron works b. tobacco factories d. laundries
Setler [38]

Answer:

a. banks

Explanation:

The slaves in the South were put to work in places where the majority of the population either didn't wanted to work, or where there was a lack of labor force. Whichever the way, the slaves were only allowed to work manual labor, usually the hardest one, so they were mostly included in the agriculture, and some in the iron works, or laundries. The banks were definitely not a place where they were allowed to work, and even if they were, they would have not been able to because they were not educated for such a work.

7 0
3 years ago
The Natives Americans of the _______, used irrigation to water their crops:
kogti [31]
Southwest is the correct answer.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Thinking about Manifest Destiny, the Texas Revolution, and The Mexican American War, do you think the choice to expand sparked a
Finger [1]

Answer:ddđ

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What factors in russia contributed to the eventual revolution?
nadezda [96]
Three of the factors in Russia which fostered the revolution of 1917 were the impoverishment of the peasants who struggled to survive on their small plots of land and to pay the debts they owed to buy their land after the serf system was changed; many peasants who couldn't make a go of it fled to the cities and took part in the local industrial revolution but were oppressed by inadequate wages and poor working conditions and lastly WWI resulted in the poor masses in Russia being used as canon fodder in an unjust imperialist war to divide up the world differently unlike WWII which was to end the Nazi tyrrany. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What made the Civil War different from any war before it? Name three things
timama [110]

Answer:

1) New and revolucionary tactics and weapons (european powers use the inspirations in WWI)

2) Number of fallen remains far higher than in any other american war before or after

3) That is was war to prevent seccesion of Southern states and breaking of USA

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does "CE" stand for?
    5·1 answer
  • Which are accurate statements about the Mormon faith and its founders?
    6·2 answers
  • In the government of Wakanda there is King T’Challa who has a lot of power but answers to a tribal council. The king/government
    11·1 answer
  • I need help on 10, 11, 12, please
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a reason for the French forts across north America? Choose the two correct answers.
    11·1 answer
  • The congress whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this constitution, or, on t
    6·2 answers
  • How did the 14th Amendment contradict the policies of President<br> Johnson?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did human zoos attract such large audiences during the modern period?
    13·1 answer
  • The colonial response to the Intolerable Acts is the start of the American Revolution.
    7·1 answer
  • The Virginia plan favored __________ states.
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!